Singers FM - Day 4 [10/20] - Thread 1

idk. if you are town read other people and find more wolfreads or actually reevaluate zug. if u find him mafia again like just actually explain it with new reasoning. its not like he hasnt posted since sod

I didnā€™t include Someone because theyā€™re at only 19 posts

that is more reasonable i will look into it

1 Like

Yes

most of these players have been playing for years so i suppose they are at least somewhat good

(What if Frost is just shitting with all of you?)

@Frostwolf103 Iā€™d want you to use it on Guava because Iā€™m becoming insanely tunnelled and you can see it too (See Guava as W)

But if you want to use it on me Iā€™d be happy for that.
Iā€™ve started to become a wagon again, after all.
Alternatively using it on a main wagon is fine.

What r these stats

been playing mafia for 3 years!

Iā€™d use it on active players instead.

Jarekā€™s a decent player all around.
Iā€™d say Iā€™m a good wolf but I also get very stressed sometimes as W.
Luxyā€™s a decent player.
Kanaveā€™s one of the players who scares me sometimes. Kanave and Achro.
In Achro we trust.

1 Like

btw my only read was not zug, Iā€™ve said before dreps seemed town on the reason that mafia wouldnā€™t flip flop as their role and he seems more like jester than mafia, but still more town than both

I donā€™t want to guess the number of town/wolves/3p so I am assuming everyone starts at 50% town/50% something else so if itā€™s >50% itā€™s a townread

The better answer is, which skilled player didnā€™t want to be checked.

Brakuuuuren :eyes:

Itā€™s fair to not want to guess that. Just bare in mind the typical ratio of 1:3 (town:non-town)
So 15:5 (Give or take 1 in each direction)

Alright maybe I either use the 50%/50% base or the 75%/25% base

The 67%/33% base seems a bit complicated to use

Other way around 15 town to 5 non-town.
Not 15 non-town to 5 town. Thatā€™d beā€¦ impossible lmao

1 Like

16:4 would be crazy i think, 15:5 or more non-town is my guess

  1. No
  2. No.
  3. No.
  4. No.
  5. No.
  6. No

Actually come to think of it, no all around