Singers FM - Day 4 [10/20] - Thread 1

Forum Games Completed
,
#7661

Okay I guess that part does look pretty bad but it’s not for me to defend them on this one I think they’d have to defend themselves here.

I mean I don’t have to. They do. Me townreading someone only goes so far I mean if I hard townread someone and then they got mod-cop checked as evil I wouldn’t be like “nah that check is wrong” I’d start questioning it a litlle bit you know. But neither would I instantly believe it and 180 on my read. I’d let them explain themselves let things develop, like now.

All I care about is if this is a fair vote or not or if it’s just scum motivated because it’s just become the easiest thing to push because of how they’re acting

#7662

Or more specifically, if they’re evil because of how they’re acting I dunno I can’t be assed explaining this in detail basically I’m not turning on them instantly I’m waiting on the fence to see what they have to say

#7663

I will say if they’re a W it means the original wagons are likely to contain a wolf as well if not both wagons. Not sure how confident I am on that feeling given that blowing up a wolf partner feels safer than just this but wcyd

#7664

Furthermore Jarek, they attempted to flip the only claimed cop, especially after townreading me up until they felt like justifying me as wolf

It felt far too opportunistic, if I didn’t select at the start of the day, I’d be dead right now

#7665

I honestly feel like the entire reason they did it was because they could quite easily justify it with saying “well Bionic did [XXX] on me”

it’s super weird they kept the bomb on them after being told to move it onto me after they received it from you

#7666

None of this is town behaviour, there is no justification for it

#7667

/shrug

#7668

We’ll see. Don’t like hopping on bandwagons.

#7669

I believe I have more than a justifiable reason to be voting catbae, I have no clue why you’re trying to discredit it

#7670

You think because I’m not rushing to put my vote on catbae that I’m trying to discredit you? if your argument falls apart by me poking it apart as easily as this then it wasn’t a good argument in the first place was it now

#7671

No, the discrediting isn’t anything to do with you.

This post insinuates heavily that you’re calling the push a bandwagon, which heavily discredits the entire push for like… literally no reason, when there’s VERY justifiable reasons to be voting catbae at the moment

#7672

You literally backed off, you didn’t prove jackshit, I completely disproved you and you just went “oh well”

#7673

Who says I backed off, I just don’t see the point in arguing with you because you clearly aren’t listening

#7674

And it isn’t my job to be catbae’s lawyer if they dont’ speak up and don’t defend themselves then maybe you’re just right I’m just saying that whatever this push is, I don’t like that people are jumping t oit

#7675

dawg, you’ve got literally nothing to prove anything of what I said wrong, you actively just said “yeah sure that makes sense” and then went “shrug oh well”

like are you actually playing forum mafia or just saying words

#7676

What do you want me to say I ain’t the one being pushed, you’re right it looks weird but I ain’t catbae so I don’t know what catbae’s intentions are and I’m not going to defend them without them defending themselves first

#7677

so then why are you trying to discredit the wagon for absolutely no reason if you’re not gonna try defend it???

#7678

okay so you didn’t hear a word I said I’m done here

#7679

I sure love engaging with you

more obnoxious than Frost when he’s tunneled

#7680

:angel: