I didn’t comment on this, but Eliza’s absolutely right, it’s something Mafia does. It’s not an exclusively textbook wolfish, but it’s entirely an valid comment.
Reanalysing.
Sticking with that earlier read.
Voting someone other than your top scumread because you think it’s preferable, fair enough.
I can see why you’d vote Eliza for being opportunistic or whatever, but I don’t really think she’s really been acting suspicious? She’s doing exactly what town!me a year ago would’ve done, seeing valid reasoning and sharing her two cents on it, sticking with what she notices, but not stretching for possible reads or whatever. Even if we’re not voting Jarek anymore (I don’t like how he’s faded from the public consciousness), Eliza hasn’t done anything I construe as evil?
Like May asks everyone who they want to execute if they had a choice, Italy gives them the answer and May thinks it’s some word metaphor. Like what?
That just doesn’t make sense to me I think it might have been a slip.
I knew what Italy meant, I just realized that I initially read “IDFM” as “I don’t fucking mind” and I thought that was funny so I typed it into the reply box. I’ve used IDFM to abbreviate I_Dislike_Forum_Mafia’s name several times before.
I don’t get providing meta… sure, seeking it out from someone else when you’re the one looking, whatever, but if a person’s linking a specific example of something they did in a game, surely they’re aware enough of it to, like suppress that tell? It’s weird to me. The only thing I’ve provided meta for is, just, like, how I tend to word things, and that’s a normal person trait that I could provide meta from my fucking email account for.
Italy, you can’t be talking about tier three forbidden knowledge in front of Zorvo. You should know better than that - having sworn the pact and seen the consequences, you should know not to blatantly disregard it like that. Obvious scum, execute immediately.