yes but you are quoting like
a fraction that only benefits your pov
ik but it sounds fun does it not
I’m mildly offended that you’re implying I didn’t “do much else” this game 
4 Likes
imo u should do it on lol
1 Like
Litearlly the hardest player to wolf case but just because you asked <3
how about these?
why are you framing it as only omgus?
thats why i said it i was joking dont actually do it
2 Likes
Debating if to do it or not regardless but I should probably use my time more wisely
1 Like
i am so distracted i am failing both at reading thread and at writing about may
3 Likes
ok guys i have to eat those food now
2 Likes
Anyways ive backread. Im going to get to a few other games now.
Garfooled is my vote atp and unless they do anything townie prob gonna stay that way(or somebody wolf tells)
??? When did I say their vote was only omgus???
#1675 was me saying Arctic posted a cop cover PSA, which Cait claimed was LAMIST, after which Arctic voted her.
My point there is that even after that whole interaction happened, you were “surprised” we needed to do cop covers — meaning you somehow missed it.
Even if Arctic had other reasons for voting Cait, you can’t deny that her calling him LAMIST was the trigger.
I can, in fact deny this, given that he is me, and I remember exactly what I was thinking at the time
I thought caitlin’s read on me was bad, but not worth a vote, and I voted them 2 minutes later after seeing their later posts, which I quoted just after the post where I voted
So garfooled is right
But this whole thing feels pointless anyway
Ok fair enough
I remembered lamist part once you mentioned it
But I didn’t think it was the primary trigger
And you didn’t include the parts I remembered the most
Which felt a bit like you were rewriting what actually happened
Mmm you’re not the first one to claim my reads are TMI-ish. Jane said that during Mountainous Arson in MU too.
Tbh it’s because I like psychology and I read behaviour + tone.
I’m not saying particularly that lamist was the trigger
But I cannot in fact say for certain it wasn’t
And I still think the way you framed that feels a bit like a “rewriting history” sort of thing
And selective
But that could just be lazy quoting
Or quoting parts that fit what you’re trying to convey
I wonder if it’s purposeful
The way you ignored their other reasons
What do you consider
“Towny”?
Like should I barf Skittles for you?
I think I’ve been fairly town
I don’t want to barf Skittles
I like Skittles
(why am I still here, oh yes… I’m procrastinating making something)