yhat post reads like you just got shipped out from the game solving factory
1 Like
You mean like the reads are fake/manufactured?
1 Like
towny read
no more like devoid of emotion so its hard to read into it
I’ve talked about it here
She’s more aware of the perception of herself as wolf she will AtE less or less hard. She is more muted even though she will still get upset when she feels she’s being treated unfairly
As town she doesn’t think about those things she is unfiltered her emotions are more raw and people town read her after her outbursts
Some shitty despicable players intentionally try to accuse this by purposely trying to upset her so they can read her reactions is gross
They used to do that to me too
Anyways
1 Like
A correct town core of 7 is auto
This is how I solve games
I need 7 town reads to win
The top is the people I’m confident in
The +5 is how many more names I need to add to get to 7
The bottom are people I’m thinking about adding
1 Like
both wolves in zugzwang/windward/guava if theres not even 1 this game is over and im leaving
VOTE: zugzwang
The last part seemed like it was somewhat joking, so I think the crying emojis make sense regardless of alignment. Also if they didn’t read it over before posting, they would have much time to be self-conscious about them anyway.
“Cait is a new person” is a perfectly reasonable angle to take, given the false belief that Cait is in fact new.
And the last part… seems fine?
What do you think a wolf would have said?
1 Like
mmmmmmm
have not heard of this tell
that being said, if I’ve done my math right, there’s about a 64% chance that 4 randomly chosen players have one or more wolves, in a game with 12 town and 3 scum (ie the champs games)
so I’d be interested in whether this actually happens at a >rand rate
arctic wrote something similar about me early on in the Sorc17er (we were t/t)
Cause I had started writing that I hated the post but then thought about it for a moment and decided I didn’t hate it
And then I felt the need to post that instead
VOTE: guava
Actually
VOTE: Luka
I will not give reasons until I feel like it, so don’t bother asking me
It’s my tell I’m famous for it and it’s very good lol
I’m gonna ask anyways
VOTE: Caitlin
Hello! I’ve backread everything, but I won’t be able to respond to anything / explain my thoughts for a bit. Give me 3 hours minimum, 8 hours maximum. Ty!
this looks fake
I find it a little hard to imagine that someone types the first sentence, then does their ISO, reaches a conclusion, then goes back and types the second sentence while also having a “hmmm” in it
feels like the conclusion was chosen before the ISO was done (also I’m not a big fan of the points made analyzing the ISO but that’s more minor imo)
VOTE: Psyx
1 Like
He snapped at you a bit. Called your read “incredibly lazy”. It’s not actually self-defence in this case, but defensive is the word I used. Aggressive might be a better word? Short-tempered? I dunno. They sound more rude. I don’t mean to be rude.