Have you considered you have skill issue?
Jk ilyyyy
How is it good? Lol. All of her arguments I responded to and portrayed why the rational was not only non-town thinking, but actively evil thinking.
You should be able to read Cait better than you are…
You’re not able to refute anything there and you actively didn’t. All you’re basically saying is “no”, without providing any reason why it’s wrong. This is genuinly frustrating.
Her whole thing about you town reading me really fast being unlike you is extremely true Luka and you know it
I liked the idea of finally masoning with you because your usually so paranoid about me.
I’ve LITERALLY explained a hundred times why all these reads on cait are just bad i’m not gonna waste my breath saying the same fucking thing when nobody wants to listen
Because lol your dating her so you can’t read her
Which at this point I’m pretty sure is what it boils down to since everytime i wrote some long ass post explaining Caits general play I get
No because one time this happened so your 10s of games of proof don’t matter cause i saw one thing be different one time
That’s genuinely frustrating
Abbi lowered from top of town reads to below may on it. Maybe top of town leans. She’s just sheeping Caitlin without providing any thought with bad logic in addition to it.
I explained why I accepted this early though, which she ignored. I even hinted at that with the bias in what she’s exactly responding to. I didn’t want to do another town flip; I honestly dont like flipping town, especially in a game with players I’ve never played with. Wolf flips are much more conferrable, especially when its with players I dont know. In adition to that, im not getting bad feelings from you like I normally do as town; IE: That trust fall game, in which the only reason I quick accepted trust was because I got a bad feeling about you and gut that you were scum. I also have town locked you very early on; and example of this I believe is the CO game in which I called you town? I dont remember games that well , but im fairly sure that was an example. So its not like I never do it either.
These are separate reads to the original SOD. You never refuted those.
I also never said this.
This frustration reads townie but I really dont want to form a read based on that; feels underhanded with the content posted prior.
Since I feel kinda buried it’s hard to get myself to post but I’ll try
You’re evil
Anybody but you. I already very thoroughly explained why its the contrary.
Then rip hypoclaims. If literally no one besides you is in favor of them they will probably fail anyway 
Zug however had the townie VT claim
- It felt like one
- Well I wasn’t allowed to say smth with little confidence so I assumed that it meant you must have high confidence before accusing someone!
- Considerably more if we count turbos also I feel like this is at least our fourth long form one
I don’t think you should know I’m town, moreso that it’s NAI for me and thus that it doesn’t make me scum; moreso, null
Why so hostile
I’m only playing along with your post
Hm. Good point. Thank you!!
I however, am generating content. Not just appearing to generate it
What does this even mean?
It’s true however. I’m accused for having bad progression, except I did have progression, the progression just isn’t mentioned by the ppl accusing me .-.
It’s rlly LAMIST and no one has that high wim
I’m not confident in my reads? At all? I bashed ppl for locking ppl in certain alignments; does that seem to you as a confident player?
And he has
It got the chat going. And what is the mafia gain of getting sussed then according to you lmao. Since according to you I did it for that but also to be LAMIST. Sounds more like… LAMISS
Well it’s an awful vote
I sussed Arctic for smth actually sus without voting him yet, you voted me for not actually being sus. How am I the sus person here
They easily can be good? I don’t know yet if they are. It’s not like you and Arctic have been flipped. How do you know I’m not correct on Arctic?
Even with New TTAG? I did play with you the least from that group, true
But according to you I’m mafia so why does it make you town that I agree with you, but me mafia. If from my PoV agreeing with you makes you town, shouldn’t I be town from your PoV lol
Or are there some double standards that this is a 1-way thing?
Oh so you are just lieing? Got it, super townie, true! Also you did townlock her, you said she can’t be SvS with me, and you also said she can’t be TvS with her being mafia. That means she is… always town .-.
Now the real question, what even is the case here? This is a bunch of comments and half of them aren’t even accusations
1 Like
Content that amounts to nothing. This is making reads to make reads; not because you actually believe it.
Nah, you had progression. But hear me out- wolves also have progression. Im accusing you for intentionally making a poor read in order to further your game plan.
bet fair
You’re acting rather confident in them for this to be the case, but thats fair. I wouldn’t know- I just see you acting confident in them. Point taken.
Point taken once again. This wasn’t the most thought out; at least the core crux of it. I stand by that it felt feigned but I dont have a good reason for that.
It was early game and there wasn’t a great reason to sus people? I still dont think your reason is very good? I vote people for not actually being sus all the time; applying pressure is a real thing. If somebody gets on with 3 votes at them they’re at least pressured. I also don’t see how applying votes that early on without a solid foundation is suspicious.
Yes.
Correctness of a push doesn’t equate to how good a push is.
I have double standards <3. Anyways, I posted my reads before you did yours and actually provided valid reasons for them imo, you did it after so id argue mine is a bit better. I also dont think you ever posted really solid reasons? Forgive me if im wrong.
That. Is. A great point. I did not realize this while making that post.
Also, Lying isn’t inherintly scummy either. You do it all the time, you’ve done it this game. Don’t act like it is.
its at the end, which you didn’t respond to funnily enough. We are witnissing selective bias. They also did not address the bias comments I made about selective replying. In addition to this, this is just me wall posting / catchup post on your ISO history. So alot of them will be comments yeah.
For one, their wallposts (p#132, p#158, p#270) were rambly and difficult to follow, when in Joat10 their posts cut straight to the point. This is what I meant by their approach being different.
Two, said wallposts had lots of self-meta/self-explanation inserted (in a way I thought were unnecessary) in-between reads, like:
Summary
Like, yeah you can explain how you formed your reads/what was the thought process behind them, but imo townies usually don’t bother unless they’re asked because “their logic just makes sense to them” and they’re focused on the actual reads themselves. On the other hand, doing it unprompted seems self-conscious to me.
1 Like
The end said TLDR, I assumed that meant it was a summary. Since I already read the actual post why would I read the summary .-.