Stratagem-15 FM - MAFIA VICTORY

Thats valid. I do it unprompted since I was annoyed alot one game for not doing it unprompted lol.

Mmk, I see. I want to see what @may says to this.

They did explain this tbf. Accordingly thats what they do on everything but this.

Thats. Fair. Its not a TLDR. I lied.

I didn’t say it explicitly in that post but I believe I said it later
If I didn’t here it is now
I think Cait is town
Mainly on vibes
But also my one sr is voting her and doubling down and you simply don’t bus in a 2-wolf game that’s insane

So it didn’t make sense because apparently I didn’t effectively communicate

I understand that Abigail townreads people quickly

This game in particular it feels like she is townreading people just to townread people rather than actually believing they are town

:+1:t2:
Thank you

I understand now that you were already townreading May but it didn’t come across that way when I read your interaction with Luka so it looked bad

I don’t trust their Caitlin vote, because I think they’re just sheeping Arctic because they know Arctic is wrong
None of their posts strike me as towny, I don’t like they way they self meta and then project their own meta onto Caitlin
It all just feels in-bad-faith

NO LITERALLYYYYY
“If I was town”
Are you not town???

OH THIS WAS ME
I think it makes Arctic more trustworthy because their read makes more sense to me, I still don’t trust Gar because their read on Caitlin doesn’t even mention that, and I still think Caitlin is town even if her question at the beginning was silly

Wait true :skull_and_crossbones::skull_and_crossbones:
This actually makes me reconsider because I’ve been scum with Gar before and they were damn near silent

ntm on me and Luka we just got out of owl house cut us some slack

Huh

Can we vote Windward instead
VOTE: WindwardAway

I mean I was saying it for comedic effect but it actually is kinda unfair to autistic people to say that not getting a joke is scummy :sob::sob:
Like we have tone tags

What

Are you asking Zugz or me? Because I don’t think I said there were any weird indiv posts in Guava’s ISO (except for them saying they couldn’t find reasons to townread Garfooled while voting them)?

It’s AI because I can’t see wolf!Guava coming up with that kind of post.

Not sure why you feel the need to “give back” a TR/TL?

I like doing it. It feels comfey. I just cant do it, especially since this kinda feels either like a pocket or just going along with a consensus TL at the very least(aside from cait).

You, was wondering if you could find anything

I think about myself a lot. And I’m trying to change up how I play, so I’ve been focusing even more than usual on what I tend to do.

Most of the comments in there were made for different reasons to each other - the one in the guava read was a joke, the one in the first Zug read was an acknowledgement of attempted playstyle change, second Zug read was an explanation of my personal biases that might influence my reads, and the one in the Guava read was a criticism of Guava’s read on me, which I thought townread me for the wrong reasons.

I think reading me as self-conscious here is fair enough, but I am just generally self-obsessed in all games and in all things. It is one of my character traits. I used to, still often do, write extremely long self-reflection walls after every game. It is not wolfy for me. I think it’s a good read from Psyx, but I also know that she is a capable wolf and so that it does not do much to further improve my read on her (which is currently a mild townlean).

2 Likes

Okay, so if I’m getting you right, you think that me saying I’ll ISO → then putting my conclusion (preceded by the “Hmmm”) → then adding the actual ISO makes the whole thing fake?

But why? That post was not strictly a read. I wanted to convince PrincessAbigail that Guava was more likely town than wolf by going over Guava’s progression (and addressing Princess’s sus points), so I put in the “conclusion” (ie the argument) first before adding the supporting points/reasoning.

This would be because they’re not intentional wallposts. I am not giving thought to structure or argument here, whereas in the hydra game, I was arguing with Achro and therefore trying to be convincing and clear, These are dressed-up stream of consciousness.

This is not relevant whatsoever to reading me, really, it doesn’t, like, help explain anything about my alignment, but I feel obligated to acknowledge and kind-of-apologise-for being difficult to follow. That’s why. I’m in the thinking out loud stage.

2 Likes

they voted her before i did though

at least one
i think i know at least one neurotypical foler

because omgus isn’t going to lead to accurate reads (yes this is me saying i agree with garfooled’s townreads)

bro u play turbos

2 Likes

meh I kind of believe these lol

.

88

90

this is why i am a dog

2 Likes

oh i guess not

i feel like they didnt actually see my vote when they did that but idk

exactly?? when have i done a cover

That’s possible
But in that world Their vote still doesn’t feel like
They at best don’t have very good reasoning but I feel like it’s more likely that they just saw Caitlin say something weird and pounced on it

VOTE: WindwardAway

Do you mind if I do it over the night phase? ISO-ing takes time and I want to catch up to the thread + look at other people. I will only consider voting Guava if they’re stuck at Garfooled (for their early D1 Cait vote) for the rest of the day.

Not at all tbh. You’ve mostly explained your POV well, I just like people pointing out singular posts that I might have missed, helps me understand view points better.

Can you explain this vote?

I was asked nicely to vote windward away

1 Like