Oh. Arctic thought you were talking about something else. 11/11 is part of the thread title. Cause there’s 11 living players in the game out of 11 total
1 Like
Oh okay neato
that explains alot ty
The first post I made was indeed saying something different - it assumed that you went back and typed the conclusion. You explained how that wasn’t the case, but I noticed other inconsistencies.
Your story does make some sense now though… I had previously thought that, when you said you wrote your “Hmmm…” post before doing the ISO, you meant you wrote that sentence, then read through Guava’s ISO, then wrote the remainder of your post (or, possibly, wrote the rest as you read the ISO).
Whereas what you claim to have (I believe it now) done is read through Guava’s ISO, presumably getting the quotes, and then wrote your “Hmmmm…” post. Which means it does make sense for it to flow into the next point like that.
That being said, a bit of me is pinged by your “Call me wolfy and vote me for all I care, but don’t you dare call me a liar.” It’s much more annoying to be suspected as a wolf for incorrect reasons than it is as town. But that’s a pretty minor point, so for now UNVOTE
But also, I just don’t understand. How is “thinking Guava’s stances are ok” before I made the post (because that’s even the whole reason why I made the ISO in the first place???) a bad thing?? What is the “lie”, even??
The second (starting with “Hmmm”) sentence was thought about before I made the post, and then I wrote it after I read Guava’s ISO. It was not “written at the same time as the first”. I don’t understand how you came to that conclusion.
The lie was probably well-enough explained in my crosspost (if it’s not I can try and word it better lol)
The sentences I viewed as being written at the same time were the “Hmmm” one and the one after that (starting with “Like”).
(which were indeed written at the same time given what you said)
The “you’re lying” bit felt personal and made me see red. Sorry.
1 Like
This is why you can’t be using your awards as your titles. I mean, the people who do use them are doing it to flex, and it works. It’s like peacock tails. Seeing someone with a “best scum player” title destroy a town is even more impressive. But the rest of us? We can’t be using awards as our titles. Read Guidelines
2 Likes
Also Arete had to bribe Chloe to get this added I can’t let their real and true monetary sacrifice be in vain
2 Likes
why should i post more for no reason. already narrowed the game down to 3 people i dont need to do more
3 Likes
Im aiming for rookie of the year 2023 (I wont get it)
So ill aim for best town player instead :3
2 Likes
Based + Townie post
When I got Rookie of the Year, the award was for a player whose first forum mafia game overall was in that year, and I was awarded it despite playing a single offsite Discord mafia game in November, because I’m an absolute fraud. (I got N1ed in that game. Because the vig shot my mason lover.)
3 Likes
My first mafia game was like. during june or something so I qualify
1 Like
(We weren’t mason lovers as a role, we were just masons by default. There was just also a loversiser who happened to blind target the two masons N0. What a game. What a game)
2 Likes
Wait what you sound like you’ve been playing for 22 forevers
2 Likes
Nope. First mafia game was 3 months ago iirc.
1 Like
When this game ends remind me to nominate you for Rookie of the Year OK
1 Like
This isnt out of game this isnt bribery if you fucking murder me badly if anything I will be more likely to nominate yo u
1 Like
poor wittle arcy
4 Likes