I looked at your early posts in Combinatorics (which is my most recent game with T!you, and to my knowledge your most recent towngame) and the tone is pretty distinctly different
also is this a serious post, and how likely is it for you to actually do this
that game was months ago afaik. im not gonna have a certain tone after randing town non-stop and then randing wolf non-stop and then on my first town game back (this one) be immediately with the same tone as the game before all of those stuff. that doesnt sound natural to me. i’d think people continually change their tone and what they do or say based off new experiences
nyaaaaaaaaaaaa
I was initially under the impression that you sounded simimlar to here in your wolfgames, but I looked back at Digital Circus and FAM4 and you don’t (tho I was tempted to push it for a while but I don’t think there’s a point in that given your response here)
oh
but do you plan to read all the game-related content and put a good amount of effort in? because I get the impression that, in general, you [give more effort / have more WIM] for towngames
what do you think about bystander
without meta I don’t have anything on her
with meta, she’s maybe >rand wolf, because her posts are more explained / detailed
I’d have to check Magnus’ post in Digital Circus about it for reference tho, to see what level of detail the mafia games tended to have, and if she’s matching that here
i dont have a read on bystander. im not convinced that her explaining or not is indicative of her alignment. she rolled over and died in the digital circus game. i dont want to force out reads from myself. i think that you’re probably town
after going over these games (Paradox Hazard, Baldur’s Gate, Hazbin Hotel, Digital Circus), I think the level of detail here (below) is less than the wolfgames
especially given that this observation is pretty basic
so Bys is fine rn actually