i can guarantee 1 scum between zorvo and memes I think we should kill them both immediately
are you against reads that early in general? if so then that would probably ease my concerns, but i’d want to see examples where similar things have happened in previous games lol
this feels like something that would be pretty black/white so now i’m curious
Day vig me then.
waste of time, youll be dying anyways
Is that a threat? Please confirm.
Memes I just want to say you are such an absolute amazing person.
This is the first time I’ve seen you but I think your really good at what you do.
Keep being you, you are amazing at it!
/Vote Zorvo
No Guys I Swear I’m Town!!!
Stop I legit wanted to get on and play a great game I don’t know why you guys are like this, I can’t take this anymore.
Alright Mission Accomplished
Thank you! I love getting love and appreciation, for that i will not do bad things to you tonight.
does anyone know what software the forum runs on
If you think this is w/w interaction, you suck at mafia.
Best most outrageous way to start day 1 in Ten Steps
Step 1: Make a bullshit claim and sound at least somewhat convinced.
Step 2: LockTown the first player to vote you.
Step 3: Make a real stupid accusation on someone.
Step 4: Talk about a Non-Game Related Thing and somehow make it game related.
Step 5: Claim you have figured out the wolf team and start naming off players not even playing the game.
Step 6: Declare a Thunderdome
Step 7: LockWolf the first player to vote you after the declared Thunderdome.
Step 8: Compliment Someone.
Step 9: Self Vote and ATE
Step 10: Show this list to everyone
cope
zorvo’s claim is obviously not something that would exist in a game by these hosts, unfortunately. i think he probably randed some weak role, got some early reads (interestingly his “target” choices are all people i townread, lol) which he felt confident about and wanted to go about them in a creative way without really thinking much about it. probably town
I’ll take things seriously now.
That was fun though.
tired me owns arctic in mafia argument
Okay going to explain this for a second time
Is this type of read bad? No
Are you mis-using it? Yes
Why?
We live in World A, in World A I arrive into thread at SoD and face no issue when it comes to making my way into the thread, I use my situation while I’m already ease in thread with no pressure to post “better”. There is simply no agenda behind this string of post as I have literally no would be status quo I need to break into
However if we live in World B, where I arrive idk, 12 hours after day start where people already have a firm grasp on other people, then yes, me doing this can be seen as wolfy as I need a crutch to get into the game.
What people need to realize is that, I’m a social person, if you talk to me or if you talk at me, I’m going to interact with you. I excel in environments where I know other people. I’m also admittedly a very “me-centric” person, a lot of time I’ll talk about my own experience and take it as the average consensus. So when I go “I don’t know half of y’all” this is me trying to establish a link with other people in thread, not because I feel like I need to talk to others to advance my own position in thread but rather because I just happen to be social.
This is heavily selection based. In the end even at the time you made those posts, I was top-posting. “At the time” stands for quite literally nothing when it was already factually incorrect at that time. Saying that I’m slightly suspicious for the fact that a very small sample of my posts revolve around the same thing, is just you being biased when it comes to using small samples.
Yes, players tend to RT. I think this is an established mafia fact and me choosing to believe your quite literal (I’m going to say it) empty reasonless vote on me, might’ve been a RT.
Literally wrong, has never been my point.
Once again, factually incorrect. You may try as hard as you will, this will never come out of my post history
False, I took the bait. I made the willing choice to interact with you further which is… the furthest thing away from having little to no desire to cooperate.
Sample: 1 game
The game I was quasi-redchecked? That’s not caught for the wrong reasons, that’s me playing around my position in threadstate
I certainly wasn’t going to cooperate with someone who claims an accurate redcheck on me, thus bad sample choice.
This is 3 degrees removed from being an actual claim, also speaking from experience, you as someone who has almost never interracted with me in a mash, I find it quite funny you suddenly choose to have a grasp of my meta. Pretty sick the meta only begun existing today.
Also
what is the difference between 60+ players 12/12s and 48/24 18ers
Your read was extremely based around threadstate and only makes sense if you’re pushing for me having a semblance of agenda in a completely different threadstate than what was occuring at the time.
Apples to Oranges
but I think arctic Villa
hence why I’m even bothering to go in depth when it comes to the arguments themselves rather than to try to uno reverse this into a flimsy wolf read
to go even more in depth I’d say that if I had no context as to who made that post and what their build-up to the read was
I’d say this is prime trying to bs a read while backed in a corner without wanting to concede said read
but I think this is too much profiling for my own good