yeah actually going back on that usage of dumbstruck
you’re overplaying? maybe not the word more like trying to be too into it if you think my message reads as anything close to dumbstruck
but yeah i was operating on the basis that it was a reaction test
shouldnt prod me bozo (amicable bozo calling)
tired me owns arctic in mafia argument
Arctic:low confidence awkward/vibes scumread on him for his re-utterance about being unfamiliar with the players
Okay going to explain this for a second time
Is this type of read bad? No
Are you mis-using it? YesWhy?
We live in World A, in World A I arrive into thread at SoD and face no issue when it comes to making my way into the thread, I use my situation while I’m already ease in thread with no pressure to post “better”. There is simply no agenda behind this string of post as I have literally no would be status quo I need to break intoHowever if we live in World B, where I arrive idk, 12 hours after day start where people already have a firm grasp on other people, then yes, me doing this can be seen as wolfy as I need a crutch to get into the game.
What people need to realize is that, I’m a social person, if you talk to me or if you talk at me, I’m going to interact with you. I excel in environments where I know other people. I’m also admittedly a very “me-centric” person, a lot of time I’ll talk about my own experience and take it as the average consensus. So when I go “I don’t know half of y’all” this is me trying to establish a link with other people in thread, not because I feel like I need to talk to others to advance my own position in thread but rather because I just happen to be social.
Arctic:you can do that as town -i just don’t think he’d be massively interested in spamming it that much in place of any other engagement with the rest of the players
This is heavily selection based. In the end even at the time you made those posts, I was top-posting. “At the time” stands for quite literally nothing when it was already factually incorrect at that time. Saying that I’m slightly suspicious for the fact that a very small sample of my posts revolve around the same thing, is just you being biased when it comes to using small samples.
Arctic:i started scumreading him was the way he responded to this read, by dismissing it as an RT/not something i believe in
Yes, players tend to RT. I think this is an established mafia fact and me choosing to believe your quite literal (I’m going to say it) empty reasonless vote on me, might’ve been a RT.
Arctic:on the premise that “you can’t have reads on someone from tone based on early posts”
Literally wrong, has never been my point.
Arctic:which… is just not a paradigm for mafia i think he believes in even in the slightest.
Once again, factually incorrect. You may try as hard as you will, this will never come out of my post history
Arctic:he reacted with hostility and little desire to cooperate in general
False, I took the bait. I made the willing choice to interact with you further which is… the furthest thing away from having little to no desire to cooperate.
Arctic:how i’ve seen him react to pressure before as scum
Sample: 1 game
Arctic:the best example being FAM1 where he thought i caught him for the wrong reasons and reacted antagonistically
The game I was quasi-redchecked? That’s not caught for the wrong reasons, that’s me playing around my position in threadstate
Arctic:reacted antagonistically
I certainly wasn’t going to cooperate with someone who claims an accurate redcheck on me, thus bad sample choice.
Arctic:i think in mashes when i’ve seen him towning he’s felt more cooperative.
This is 3 degrees removed from being an actual claim, also speaking from experience, you as someone who has almost never interracted with me in a mash, I find it quite funny you suddenly choose to have a grasp of my meta. Pretty sick the meta only begun existing today.
Also
Arctic:in mashes
what is the difference between 60+ players 12/12s and 48/24 18ers
Arctic:are you against reads that early in general?
Your read was extremely based around threadstate and only makes sense if you’re pushing for me having a semblance of agenda in a completely different threadstate than what was occuring at the time.
Apples to Oranges
but I think arctic Villa
hence why I’m even bothering to go in depth when it comes to the arguments themselves rather than to try to uno reverse this into a flimsy wolf read
to go even more in depth I’d say that if I had no context as to who made that post and what their build-up to the read was
I’d say this is prime trying to bs a read while backed in a corner without wanting to concede said read
but I think this is too much profiling for my own good
Arctic:i just feel like he’d care more about why i scumread him.
Me responding to you literally makes it so you talk about it furthermore and I thus develop a deeper read :+1
and that’s all up to the point of your post around the #670 mark