I never said it would confirm me100%. Stop trying to twist my words to suit your agenda.
They need to be right on 4 of them to gain one extra vote though.
There’s something about myability that I ne eff d to ask Zone about though.
He answered my question.
Time for me to eat supper.
Interesting conversation, it is about you and Aleph come to agreement, confident at that too.
First
1 Like
Kowalski, analysis!
believe they’re talking about how it’s their first post ITT
or maybe it’s just they thought they were first to post at all ITT
no way to know…
I am saying if Bean made her stance on first posts and how she view the players that responded so far. I think Leafia is taking this seriously in my opinion.
As for Derp’s claim to be lynchproof, the way about anti claim how it works, requires the mafia to make their guesses at night. Leafia’s vote on Derps is NAI, for all I know Derps is using the term loosely. Whether he realizes he outed earlier so the mafia can attempt to guess his role correctly only once so that one extra vote is only going to be viable at Day 2 technically and never be used again or knows he is going to bait the mafia, remains to be seen.
I don’t buy derps being lynchproof
sounds to me like standard D1 bullshit if this is the same derps i remember on oldFoL all those years ago
thematically on this setup flavor, it makes sense since it’s all around voting powers and executions. The difference between bulletproof and blastproof.
On one side I think he would at least notices he isnt going to be executed if he’s telling the truth, making the anticlaim useless on him
HOWEVER
This is non-bastard game, so I dont know about Zone making a role to specifically fight the anti-claim by design.
And if you tell it you got lynchproof role, then…the element of surprise is gone 
Requesting the threat of nightly protection so as to decrease the likelihood of prompt murder. Not actually requesting protection.
Leafia’s insinuating a publicised effect which she usually does pretty much every towngame, her combative nature and self-assured cadence are practically standard hallmarks. Leafia’s town and I’m tired of pretending she’s not.
(I don’t actually know this.)
Chomps is entirely null. My vague approximation is that Chomps might have debated Leafia’s scumread in some way if they cared less, like “my opener isn’t wolfy whatchu talking bout?” akin to Leafia’s own defense against SDA, but they took nearly a minute to go “eh” and then disappeared so potentially nullscum when personalised to Chomps’ behaviour but there’s really nothing here.
SDA immediately miscontextualised Leafia’s claim (#20, and did not back when corrected, which is overly aggressive and blatantly incorrect but that’s the impression I usually reach with v!SDA so I don’t think it’s innately suspicious. I would’ve liked it to be, but objectively speaking this is also close to null plus a spotlight flare.
Ishmael responded to Leafia with a similar quizzical demeanour but having far more understanding about the affairs of her commentary, but has also relatively played the middle with the limited time she’s been here; frivolously discussing the impediments if Leafia claims, acknowledging Bean’s arrival and trading idle words with Frost over the nature of SDA’s own claim. At the very least she would’ve had time to verbalise a position of neutrality on SDA. Scumlean with a spotlight flare.
Jarek claimed to be town, what more does one need?
If Frost continues rambling theories all day and all game, he’s town. I think w!Frost would lose the motivation and relapse into a quieter position as time carried on.
I’ll be amiss until more interesting exchanges arise.
I would never how dare you
Its called deduction, not theory.
So are you going to tell me something I dont know about derps, I am all ears.
Theories are guesses upheld by logic or evidence, which in turn underpins the metric of deduction. They’re synonymous, you’re all good.
Where does that come from?