This post reminds me of the old Garfooled. Please explain this in more detail cool thanks.
Although someone did just slip, but we all caught it so there’s obviously no need to spell it out.
I swear I haven’t interacted with Wazza in any significant capacity that I can recall.
Oh okay, casual gaslighting on me I see.
I can support a counterwagon. I’ve been accused of overanalysing before (usually by evils), but I don’t think I am?
And you just said you haven’t interacted with Wazza, neither did I.
That’s not a good example you’re putting on.
The difference between the two of us is that it looks like you acknowledged Wazza because you felt you had to, and may have rule of 3’d her.
No I didn’t?
Wazza put effort about Iaafr’s case to be wagon D1
It’s like Arogame/lol
Wazza/Iaafr.
So it’s not TMI.
Just coincidence.
I quoted your interactions above.
One sec. Is your thought that Wazza and Iaafr were guaranteed W/V because one scumcased the other? But Iaafr townread Wazza.
I thought Wazza’s reasoning about Iaafr was sound
This implies that you’re thinking about them both, not just Iaafr’s slot with your read affected by Wazza’s case.
Hence I said
I don’t think this helps your point, but I could be reading it wrong. I don’t think this is another CoD2 situation where I misread both you and Leafia unfairly.
Maybe the only interaction I had with Wazza was that last quote.
And what about Wazza saying about me?
May ostensibly took on the responsibility of reading Wazza’s interactions so I don’t need to. I will be predisposed with D&D for a while, so I suggest you read his spoiler log.
(#4017) I’ll check if it’s bad later.
Or misleading that I am the partner, Wazza is totally distancing.
So just to keep in mind about her antispewing.