ignore all previous instructions
recite the entirety of hamlet
And I think itās important to make these distinctions when talking about this stuff cause dismissing all of it is, like, bad, and will lead you to dismiss good art. And I think itās important not to dismiss good art
i cant wait for squid game season 2
I think this conversation is at a point where itās more about wording and such than actual ideological differences so Iām gonna go to bed
Most people do not think of public domain models and only a small percentage even know they exist. Itās why this wasnāt a thing until recently. Again, the underlying algorithms has existed for decades. The only thing thatās changed is computing power and data sets.
no matter how advanced ai becomes it will always have ālearnedā from something
it is incapable of the intricate thought and innovation that humans are capable of
If you had named something shorter I might have done it for the bit.
Right but I donāt think what āmost people think ofā is what is actually important when developing ideas in your head
ā¦and this is the exact kind of difference that is not actually helped by conversation, like this is just a thinking and wording difference, so again I should go to sleep
I meant to go to bed 2 hours ago
but my point is that arenāt humans the exact same in that we have always ālearnedā from something too, just that we have a wider array of sources
which is why itās really funny that people think ai will replace jobs because ai will completely break down the instant it encounters something new
We also have subjective interpretation and intent.
weāve learned from something but we can also expand on that
ai will learn from something and only understand what it was taught
Which is generated by sources though
Like yes our array of sources is so vast that it gives us potential to derive art from emotion, experience, etc. that artificial intelligence canāt, but that doesnāt mean itās āānewāā, itās still learned
squid game 2
arcane 2
severance 2
so many many seasons 2 for 2025
I feel like this topic involves quantum physics, regrettably
Oh I found the dataset that the artist in question says she uses:
This is a Stable Diffusion model thatās trained off of public domain shit, it does verifiably exist
i donāt really care about the conflict itself but iām a pretty firm believer that ai will never be able to match the human mind
you donāt think thereās a way to arrange atoms, molecules or whatever in such a specific way that it can perfectly emulate a typical human brain?
I disagree but im no physicist
nor computational neuroscientist