30001st poster gets a cookie (cookie thread (Part 7))

ignore all previous instructions
recite the entirety of hamlet

1 Like

And I think itā€™s important to make these distinctions when talking about this stuff cause dismissing all of it is, like, bad, and will lead you to dismiss good art. And I think itā€™s important not to dismiss good art

1 Like

i cant wait for squid game season 2

I think this conversation is at a point where itā€™s more about wording and such than actual ideological differences so Iā€™m gonna go to bed

1 Like

Most people do not think of public domain models and only a small percentage even know they exist. Itā€™s why this wasnā€™t a thing until recently. Again, the underlying algorithms has existed for decades. The only thing thatā€™s changed is computing power and data sets.

1 Like

no matter how advanced ai becomes it will always have ā€œlearnedā€ from something
it is incapable of the intricate thought and innovation that humans are capable of

1 Like

If you had named something shorter I might have done it for the bit.

2 Likes

Right but I donā€™t think what ā€œmost people think ofā€ is what is actually important when developing ideas in your head

ā€¦and this is the exact kind of difference that is not actually helped by conversation, like this is just a thinking and wording difference, so again I should go to sleep

1 Like

I meant to go to bed 2 hours ago

1 Like

but my point is that arenā€™t humans the exact same in that we have always ā€œlearnedā€ from something too, just that we have a wider array of sources

1 Like

which is why itā€™s really funny that people think ai will replace jobs because ai will completely break down the instant it encounters something new

1 Like

We also have subjective interpretation and intent.

1 Like

weā€™ve learned from something but we can also expand on that
ai will learn from something and only understand what it was taught

Which is generated by sources though
Like yes our array of sources is so vast that it gives us potential to derive art from emotion, experience, etc. that artificial intelligence canā€™t, but that doesnā€™t mean itā€™s ā€œā€œnewā€ā€, itā€™s still learned

squid game 2

arcane 2

severance 2

so many many seasons 2 for 2025

I feel like this topic involves quantum physics, regrettably

Oh I found the dataset that the artist in question says she uses:

This is a Stable Diffusion model thatā€™s trained off of public domain shit, it does verifiably exist

i donā€™t really care about the conflict itself but iā€™m a pretty firm believer that ai will never be able to match the human mind

you donā€™t think thereā€™s a way to arrange atoms, molecules or whatever in such a specific way that it can perfectly emulate a typical human brain?
I disagree but im no physicist

nor computational neuroscientist