This is the crux of your whole argument; 'well someone else did it, in a completely different point of the game and before it actually mattered, so its invalided"
That is false for numerous ways.
Yes. Because wolves believe you can win the game for them via your thinking.
Ok thatās not what I said.
I asked why do YOU TR them.
No, itās just optimal to give me the bomb.
After you Iām arguably the next most likely town, wolves have to give the bomb to someone in the said clears or else itās a misplay.
Tutuu - Their posts have shown unrelating passion throughout, synomous of the games Iāve read, of which they were town in. Theyāve showed extreme emotion in arguments against arete, which is why we cleared the latter, and have continually helped this game.
Baker - They have no level of control over the thread, very unlike their scumgames, and have shown regular passion, again, unlike their scumgames
Olivest - May is incapable of wolfing. Story is both struggling to emulate May at any point, wanting others to know which one it is anyway, and has shown solving they havenāt in hells echos.
Thatād be tutuu. Arctic has played enough games with them to read, and theyāre more important to keep around.
Youād only get the bomb because they think youād make a mistake
2 Likes
I have looked at the evidence.
Iām aware this is a team game.
Iāve been supporting my team heavily today because unlike some players such as yourself Iām not assuming who the town is, Iām aiming to find them and help them succeed.
I think there is a misclear, potentially 2 which would really make this situation, a whole lot worse.
For no reason. And now you assume I am not helping because you disagree.
1 Like
Yes there can not be a misclear.
But let me ask you something @Agent47
This year, how many misclears has their been?
VOTE: NoExecute
Get him out of my sight.
I have little clue whatās going on
For a game with a post cap, a lot has been going on, and a surprising lot feels NAI
I never said you are not helping I said Iāve been helping heavily today which you seem to think I havenāt.
Oh, by the way.
You know what to think upon someone hammering, more about their motives.
Should I hammer, idk how useful it is
have you considered the possibility that people can change their meta
Oh. Itās not.
I was just curious to see how people would react to the opportunity. I expected you to gopher it.
Have you considered when people say theyāre 100% correct, they have a reason
I know for a fact you arenāt correct
Am I not?
mhm
āI bring FACTS and LOGIC to the table, and I get ignored.ā
Regardless of the outcome, itās hard for me to think I was not correct. Perhaps I wonāt trust the people I know shouldāve known the risks had they been wrong, but itās merely a learning experience. Either way, it was fundamentally correct.
1 Like