we can’t let a neutral run free
Someone and pizza i got nothing on.
Pizza i thought seemed genuine day 1.
Someone nothing at all
They’d have to be pretty bold and how are you so sure Wazza is a wolf here?
I am not, but if I’m wrong, we just kill a neutral, nothing lost
As long as a neutral is helping town, I’m fine with letting them live.
neutrals are the safest lynches
A neutral can side with town Bionic. Yes, something is lost. A potential ally.
Wolves are far safer lynches.
they can just as easily lie, be another neutral, be a wolf, stop townsiding beacsue their goal needs it, stop townsiding from wolf pressure, stop townsiding beacuse they aren’t feeling like it
I mean bionic isnt wrong that we lose nothing on killing a neutral. But ideally we could basically put Wazza on a leash and have ourselves a pet Neutral.
only lynch I’d consider safer over wazza is eve
Then why are you pushing Wazza instead of Eve?
so why not vote them and put pressure
because i hate neutrals
We lose a potential.ally if we kill a neutral so yes we do lose something by killing one.
So? That’s not a good reason.
I’ve listed many good reasons before it
Numbers wise we do not its better than a mislynch.
They can just as easily do none of that stuff and if town helps them, then they’ll be more likely to townside. Besides, if Wazza really is a neut, I highly doubt she’ll side with scum because she owes me for helping her win that one game where I was a survivor.
e