me when i wield the nefarious tennis racket that spills battery acid
1 Like
Reveals being false would be bastard.
Agreed. He is right. VOTE: Canping
Good night.
Please explain this vote. Seems a bit too opportunistic to me. Giving Willow a very slight scumlean here.
Now calling it a night so good night everyone. 
2 Likes
What if the anti-claim is an ability?
In that case SMILEY would be immune towards anti-claim.
(I just donāt think ZONE would overlook the interaction between the anti-claim and a self-revealing role.)
Itās certainly a possibility.
Iād think itās either an assigned ability or a factional based ability.
Of course this is just contemplation but 
I donāt think Zone would overlook it, I think it might be something on purpose idk
I am preparing an opening post, but I would like to separate out any questions I find myself having so that they do not get lost.
Leafia, would you say you are self-resolving this game? Do you think your ability will clear you?
1 Like
Would you say you stand by the read, even despite this observation, or do you think that this confrontational nature is not alignment indicative?
If you absolutely had to make a call, would you say that Jarek is more villagery or more wolfy off of this joke (or non-joke) vote?
Could you elaborate on this? Is there anything at all which you could cite as a reason that you feel this way?
Hello, everybody. Iām excited to play again.
Inexplicably, I find this post wolfy. I believe it is due to the sense of meaningless correction here, as it forms an assertion of game-knowledge without any actual productivity.
This is something I feel others might find to be a wolfy post for the reason I mentioned regarding Canping above, but from my knowledge of Marluna in particular, I donāt especially feel this way.
I find this brief pop-in lightly villagery.
Similarly, this rebellion is utterly pointless on its surface, so I like it.
A piece of mechanical speculation: I do not think Zone_Q11 would have added this role without a greater purpose. While the revealed rolecard cannot contain overt lies, as this is a bastard game, I feel there must be some interesting intention here, and so I suspect there is a ātradeoffā to keeping this role alive, whether it is the ability to anti-claim it or otherwise. Does that mean we should execute it? I do not know for sure.
The other potential āfunctionā of this role is to create a tradeoff for the mafia, whether they choose to kill or roleblock the NPC with a known powerful role or a villager with an unknown role. I would find this an interesting choice, but I am not sure if that is exactly Zone_Q11ās style.
As a note, if the mafia have any blocking power whatsoever, they can roleblock Smiley and then claim its benefits for themselves, so it is not clearing for a player to say they received a benefit from Smiley. I believe the only announced benefit is the private vote, so this strategy is only possible on Night 3. It is obvious enough as a strategy that I will not play coy about this possibility.
While this backpedals on the rebelliousness I found villagery, it feels natural and unforced as a clarification, so I am not modifying this read.
I continue to feel rather neutral about Marlunaās discussion here: it is something that is utterly fakeable, and yet something that a villager does have every incentive to say.
Jarek is my top town for the time being.
This is also good thought.
I appreciate the mindmeld with Willow here (and the indignation from Jarek), though I do not think it especially alignment-indicative on its face.
This is good on-the-ground self-reflection which I find villagery.
I find this rather genuine.
I also find this thought genuine-seeming. A Leafia who legitimately wolfreads Jarek intensely would have this exact thought.
I like this thought, but I do not think it is necessarily true: the neutral could be considered an additional āroleā which is in the game. I believe the fact that the role ājoined the gameā in the signup thread implies that it was a pre-game effect rather than an in-game one.
My thoughts exactly.
I find this unprompted thought to be villagery.
I find this aggression to be slightly villagery.
This opener appears to be what should more naturally come as an āinside thoughtā for wolves: āwe can anti-claim the neutralā is something that a wolf would first think to say in wolfchat, not in the thread. However, it is too easy to fake for me to feel especially good about.
I find this post agreeable enough.
I also agree that there had to be some intentionality to this decision. I do not think such anti-claim would be disastrous to the village, as it is almost certainly āfreeā for the wolves and avoiding triggering it means giving up our execution for the day, but there must be a tradeoff.
Constructing a read list:
Jarek t
Willow t
Leafia t
Chomps lt
Kiiruma n
Canping n
Heiter n
soweli n
Marluna n
I do not find these first hundred posts especially fruitful in terms of finding wolfreads. A large portion of the players have not yet posted, of course, but I do not think the wolves necessarily lie in that pool.
1 Like
low-key I just thought āhey i should probably vote somebody, too much mech discussion too early is bad etc.ā and then scrolled up and got vaguely bad vibes from this post
i think? I donāt know i might be placeboāing it and also I did read the whole thread but donāt think i gained anything from it; i do have another person iām considering voting (ooh spooky!!!)
I see. I certainly cannot fault you for failing to find much in the thread to date ā I have also found myself in the same predicament ā and I find the thought process on Canping realistic and similar to my own.
I will place soweli as a light townread.
I am mildly concerned that 2 people voted canping immediately after me;
Also I mean idk take a free townread for the walls with like good enough reads wow nuance <3 idk iām sleepy and/or not in a good mood and/or sick but in a new way somehow
Did double check and I am still interested in voting [player] but am refraining from doing so for strategic reasons or something di
damn
1 Like
nah
but iām not sure if thatās actually whatās happening
but if it is. yea no itās NAI
no, they canāt.
they either leave it alone, or kill it. No middle point cause of the neutralās immunity.
(or anti-claim it, if the anti-claim isnāt someoneās ability.)
1 Like
Ah, it appears I missed a line. Thank you for the clarification.
1 Like
Couldnāt sleep and no, it probably wonāt clear me.
Please explain.
All in all, Iām getting villagery vibes from Rhea right now. Townlean.
How is that a mindmeld?
Now to head off for real. Good night again everyone.