and of course, r/botc’s magnum opus (unfortunately since deleted)
3 Likes
anyway it’s my utmost hope that the lizards host team is inspired by the r/botc design philosophy
1 Like
You’re going to make this game unplayable
1 Like
implying botc was ever playable
2 Likes
And yet you’re going to play it. Curious!
per botc terming wouldn’t it be “there is at least 1 outsider in play”
1 Like
magnus and hazzy: “oh man, we just don’t have any ideas for a dreamer townsfolk mutation”
the analyst:
1 Like
I already posted a Dreamer mutation!
You’re correct but Hazard wrote the first half of the OP and stole my format for the rest.
2 Likes
Then again, I think he took the wording from Taco? I’m unsure.
Amelia, which modification would you theoretically prefer to apply to a Townsfolk role if you absolutely needed to do so?
[-2 Outsiders] (or at least just more than one).
[-0 or -1 Outsider]
[-1 or +1 Outsider]
Specifically since you hate -1 because it just replaces an Outsider slot, not for anything else.
if thats the case isnt your thing glaringly obvious
i think the last one could actually work with a townsfolk that had variable function depending on whether it added or removed an outsider
I don’t know what this means.
if what you said about amelia hating -1 on a townsfolk is true, isn’t your question very obvious to what they will answer
Introducing the Townsfolk Trizkidek.
Amelia hates the [-1 Outsider] Townsfolk because then it’s just a literal Townsfolk taking an Outsider slot, and aside from that everything else about the setup remains the same.
Having variable influence might mitigate this concern in their eyes.
third thing because you can actually create an interesting ability with it
but also I’d do [-1 to +1 Outsider] instead of or
1 Like