Especially considering only two evil members were in the chat during n1
Why is it a non-argument? Zorvo is stating that I’d be the only one to attack Garfooled N1, probably because of our previous connection as I have no way why he would specifically link us otherwise. And clearly it makes no sense
Even if I would have input, why would I suggest Garfooled?
The argument that you wouldnt kill someone because you were friends has been proven false repeatedly, across many games of mafia.
When you haven’t seen someone in that long it probably would count for me in my deliberation, but maybe it wouldn’t Ig
Even so, there’s no reason why I have more chance of wanting her out
Why would you not try to convert your friend, then?
I guess it makes sense that maybe I’d try to do that lol
But the evils converted Guava, and possibly attacked Garfooled, so that’s still an indication that I’m not evil, or imo it’s atleast NAI at worst
It was discussed guava was a backup target, since they were only really somewhat towny, only during d1, and had no claim
Why does that matter? They’re the one that ended up being converted
This
I may join games because some people are in it thst I like but I won’t hold back if it helps me win
Often I’d kill them more tbh, they know how to read me
Because, the Luminary would still visit them
And they’d be added to scumchat
Well
Target, specifically
Wingman, have you claimed?
I have not.
Why is that?
How would they do that? They’d be converting Guava already
I feel it better to hide what I am, at least for a day
I see no reason to hide it tommorow
I may be mistaken
One moment
MM attempts 2 converts on N1 meaning they can target 2 players if the first fails, pretty sure they’re able to add NE if they hit them and still convert a 2nd target tbh
Oh, I didn’t know about that
Seems like a weird mechanic