you know i think the lower back inferno would preclude saving a drowning kid more than workplace regulations
I am not getting written up to save a child I do not know, no
no i’m just pointing it out
when i’m a drowning child and the only person to walk past is n1 who’s in bad standing for missing 2 days of work
ouch
conssistent though yeah
n wouldn’t miss work
perefect attedance
you know what i’m willing to hear n1 out just to dunk on singer
If I can afford the tardy without penalty I’ll do it because my attendance is almost always perfect, but i won’t get written up that’s for sure
devli’s advocate: if a child is drowning in a shallow pond
then i’m not sure how long they’ll make it even after you rescue them. useless
Good. That seems as if it must be the right answer. Peter Singer has stated that his students, when asked about this scenario, unanimously respond that they have a moral obligation to save the child.
Okay, now suppose that there are other people walking past who would equally be able to rescue the child but are not doing so. Does the fact that they are not doing what ought to be done mean that you’re no longer obligated to save the child?
It makes no difference. I still have a moral obligation to save the child.
It makes a difference. I’m no longer obligated to save the child.
push them into the lake. force their hand
The question isn’t that you would or wouldn’t.
this is the morally correct answer (i can’t swim)
It has let up. Over the past 9 months i have sealed it away with psychotic cardio. I’m a really great swimmer now
I feel like if you said “sorry im late i was saving a drowning kid” you would probably get a pass but I don’t actually know what you do so maybe you work at a child drowning factory and they’d fire you for that
no difference, you still have a moral obligation
How do I win the cookie? I’m supposed to be losing weight since I’m fat as hell, but I still kind of want one
guys are you gonna let n answer the question first
It’s in the title.