how the fuck are you gonna save a drowning kid in another country
da
this was fun
if im drowning in a lake iâll scream for you and see what happens
i know what this is leading up to and i know peter singer doesnât practice what he preaches. why take this seriously
marginal utility is peter singer father
mage hands
Iâve had people across the world save my life.
i donât know what its leading up to its amazing
reading this as âmay is a saintâ instead of âmay writes his own moralityâ
remember the champagne question? pretty much that
The Drowning Child
Good, thatâs a pleasing response, especially if one takes into account that the idea that we have a greater moral obligation towards those who are local to us - our fellow country people, for example - than to those who are far away is not uncommon (albeit it is hard to justify).
Final Question
Likely youâll be pleased to hear that youâre virtually at the end now. We just want to ask you one further question, but this time it isnât specifically to do with the drowning child scenario. Here it is:
Are you morally obliged to make a relatively small donation, perhaps to the value of a new shirt or a night out at a restaurant, to an overseas aid agency such as Oxfam within the next few days (and even if you have previously made such a donation, perhaps even recently)?
Yes, I am morally obliged to make such a donation.
No, I am not morally obliged to make such a donation.
may is a saint and I am townreading him for his posts
so heavy handed for a man who has surely bought champagne before
i was just thinking of story and here they are
I said âwho up birthing they dayâ on this stream
what the fuck is this
i could hear you. or i wake up at 6am on wednesdays
yes! save the metaphorical drowning child!
Most charities are either bloated, mismanaged, or scams, so never
i see no moral issue here
peter singer has never realized that charities have operation costs and that not all of your money is actually going to save people (and that itâs surely not gonna save people from drowning)