Cookie Thread Act 3: The Cookie Strikes Back

do you accept lying to all your coworkers that you valued your job more then someone elses life, or do you tell them and potentinally ruin relationships

Morally obligated to fund guardrails on this lake or something

1 Like

after the fifth child i would probably start looking for the child drowner

1 Like

these questions are easy, just save the kid. I’m sure this will have no troubling implications later on in the quiz

2 Likes

HE ALMOST BEAT YOU
YOU ARE DOING GREAT ARETE

What is the basis to any moral obligation?

Isn’t is entirely subjective?

Can an obligation ever be subjective?

the obligation is to flip off peter singer by pointing out the existence of false dichotomies

Multiple colleagues are already aware that i value my job more than everyone’s lives, my own included

Yup, that’s got to be the morally sound response. The fact you dirtied your work shirt rescuing some kid last week surely doesn’t annul your obligation to help a child this week who may well drown without your intervention.

Okay, we’re now going to widen our focus a little to see whether this alters how you view the issue of moral obligation as it applies here.

Water Safety

It’s possible that you’re not aware that in the United States drowning is the second leading cause of unintentional injury/death for children aged 1 to 14 years. Does the fact that saving this particular child’s life won’t contribute towards solving the more general problem of water safety mean that you’re not obligated to save the child after all?

No, I still have a moral obligation to save the child.
Yes, actually it does mean I do not have a moral obligation to save the child.

Everything I want to do is moral and everything I don’t want to do is immoral

but they’ve yet to truly see it in action

1 Like

still obligated

1 Like

some of these philosophers try their hardest to frame these questions as psychotically as they can

1 Like

I have a moral obligation to do this mandarin homework, and here I am being evil reading useless messages

2 Likes

It’s possible that in the World, Death is the leading cause of Death. Does that mean you aren’t obligated to save this child’s life???

e Drowning Child

Excellent, we reckon that response shows you’ve got your head screwed on right. After all, if you were drowning, then likely you wouldn’t be best pleased if your would-be rescuers announced they weren’t going to bother pulling you out of the water because lots of other people were also going to drown over the next year.

A Matter of Geography

We have one final question based on this scenario. Would it make any difference if the child were far away, in another country perhaps, but similarly in danger of death, and equally within your means to save, at no great cost – and absolutely no danger – to yourself?

It would make no difference. I would have a moral obligation to save the child.
That would make a difference. I would not have a moral obligation to save the child.

I have a moral obligation to sleep and here I am watchinf nyself back on a Twitch stream

1 Like

still obligated

1 Like

True
I mean if it were possible i would just call my boss to see if I could get a pass to save the kid

1 Like

to poke fun at n in an enderaing way but imagine this but you are late for work

2 Likes