I would suspect that new forms of machine learning will come along, wouldnt be that worried
currntly working on Machine Learning 2
a machine that is flawed from first principles is never going to answer âYesâ to âAm I flawed from first principles?â and itâs never going to accurately explain why
Chess has like 7 major engines that analyze one another
â But itâs not obvious that Socratesâ interpretation is the right way to understand the oracleâs message. In fact, the priestess didnât say that Socrates was wiser than everyone else, she said that no one was wiser than Socrates. This is compatible with the following propositions:
-
Everyone is as wise as Socrates.
-
Socrates is no wiser than anyone else.
-
No one is very wise.
-
No one is at all wise.
So the oracle may have been saying that Socrates is not at all wise and in that respect is no different from, and certainly no better than, anyone else. But Socrates immediately turns this into the pronouncement that he is the wisest â meaning (a) that he has some kind of wisdom (which the oracle didnât say) and (b) that he has more of it than anyone else (which she also didnât sayâ
This is the funniest interpretation
yeah fun fact we still donât really know what knowledge is. edmund gettier has a pretty cool two page paper in which he overturned the entire field of epistemology and it hasnât been figured out since https://fitelson.org/proseminar/gettier.pdf
the strongest chess engine is a learning algorithm that they just left running overnight
even if you do believe knowledge is âjustified true beliefâ thereâs the question as to whether the âjustifiedâ part is even needed. i have known things with completely inaccurate justifications for why
all of which function according to very similar principles
i accept that chess engines are very neat algorithms, but i actually donât think the chess engines can meaninguflly report on each other even if they can meaningfully make decisions
the strongest cheese engine is a mouse named story
good. if we ever know what knowing is we will explode. Stop looking into the brain. We should NOT know how it works. we will all perish
personally I think that instead of making false criticisms of AI companies (âOpenAI isnât even vaguely trying to understand how their AIs workâ) we should make true comparisons (âOpenAI made a big deal about how much they care about safety, wrote policies that prohibited the use of their AIs for military, warfare, or weapons development, then deleted those policies and started working with the literal Pentagonâ)
there are lots of valid criticisms of AI companies!
but that first point is fucking true
Wait what
you cannot prove your system isnât fundamentally flawed using that fucking system
This ai doesnât tell me how I can rob a bank but it works with the them
no yeah thatâs true theyâre training models to perform spotting for artillery
âWe care about public PR until the governments pays us a lot of moneyâ
tale as old as time
imagine working with the literal Pentagon
i liked the part where people started intentionally poisoning ai learning out of spite