yes lol
So like, did they justify their reasoning behind voting No?
ok but if that ever happened they’d have been caught with supply amounts
right. because at some point, theres a certain amount of weed in a car that makes it okay to force prisoners to risk their lives fighting fires for their freedom
it’s not about the amount
it’s what the amount suggests about intent
If there was a tall police woman with aviator sunglasses i would plant drugs on myself just so she can search me and force me to work for her
its a vague enough line that makes it unfair. And, importantly, even having like a bunch of weed, and selling it to people, should not make it okay to be made a literal slave
or, importantly, doing just about anything.
im watching a man get more and more aggressively drunk off of a concoction known as ‘gator wine’ whilst eating around 25 different horrid food items
Is it that football guy that eats and drinks anything
no I agree but the way you had phrased it made your points very weak because it was somewhat misleading
it’d even be stronger to assume worst case scenario and say cannabis drug dealers than “someone [who] got caught with weed in their car once” because it’s probably a popular idea that cannabis drug dealers should not be subject to forced labour
nein he did just eat two rubber bands which was holding together a pickle cut in half with a snickers bar put inbetween it
i mean only very recently (past couple years) were there still people in prisons on felony weed crimes in CA.
You’re not a drug-sniffing police dog.
I like sniffing
Sniff sniff
I have regrettably forgotten how to get into the American section of my legal database
one moment
Sniff yourself some jobs, janiboy
and plenty of people still imprisoned during the active periods of this wildfire program.
point is, ideas of what should or shouldnt be a felony can vary over time, proving the point that forced labor is horrific even if you think its by some metric deserved now