Also I have a question about the Melanie King.
Does that statement have to be strictly after the nomination, or would any statement made publicly count?
Also I have a question about the Melanie King.
Does that statement have to be strictly after the nomination, or would any statement made publicly count?
I gather no one has any shared information that could lead us to suspect someone?
Currently no. Although I’d be interested in whispering if you’d like to!
OK sure
/whisper crazynuto
The statement has to be made during the nomination sentence.
This is an optional ruling of longform.
I’m confident Magnus is good
I also feel like Nuto might be good as well
/accept
I’ll make it
tbh everyone is good D1 lets not kill anyone this is my hot-take
Now granted random killing could kill an evil but it could also kill a good player I also don’t like dying early in these games so I’m naturally inclined to being a pacifist at least early on
Okay not gonna lie expected more debate off of this hot-take not sure what kind of debate but there isn’t one
Being a pacifist is lame
VOTE: Kiiruma
no exe always benefits evil, at least in traditional FM
we should kill someone
VOTE: magnus
VOTE: pidgeon
VOTE: kiiruma
VOTE: magnus
VOTE: pigeon*
VOTE: kiiruma
Is that even allowed?
Nominator | Nominee | # | Voters |
---|---|---|---|
pandora | Mistyx | 0 | |
Magnus | thepigeonnyc | 2 | Magnus, pandora |
Prisma101 | crazynuto | 0 | |
pandora | Magnus | 2 | Bionic, pandora |
Jarek | Kiiruma | 2 | Jarek, pandora |
Not Voting | 7 | Prisma101, Mistyx, Jarek, thepigeonnyc, Bionic, Kiiruma, Moll, crazynuto, May |
thepigeonnyc (2): Magnus, pandora
Magnus (2): Bionic, pandora
Kiiruma (2): Jarek, pandora
Not Voting (7): Mistyx, thepigeonnyc, Kiiruma, Moll, crazynuto, May, Prisma101
When was this nomination?
@pandora Could you explain your nomination and vote on Magnus? You didn’t provide much reasoning despite them being a super high poster
Pandora voted to exile Mistyx before the rest of those nominations were made, mistaking Travellers as eligible applicants.
It’s reasons weren’t substantial.