I’m one. Of the best at reacting
Is it worth sharing information about other people if it can guarantee an innocent child in F3?
Yes
Are you biased?
Yes
Do you just want to know things?
Yes
Do you regret being the Demon?
1 Like
Yes
1 Like
I respect your honesty. I’ll give some in return.
1 Like
Where
The Peter Lucas pings are, in order: May, Pandora, Pandora, Moll.
Respectively meaning: nothing, could be Melanie, could be Sasha, Slaughter ping could be poisoned.
Except according to Prisma’s additional information, the second ping was tampered with, redirected into Jarek. This was the night he learned “Prisma”.
Of course, Peter Lucas doesn’t have to poison the player it interacts with; this is why Jarek can’t be confirmed as not the Demon. However, this could both independently resolve Jarek’s N2 information (not the rest of it), and the redcheck on May. Because they can’t all be evil.
Which means you have both inadvertently confirmed one alive player as town in all worlds. I’m sure that’s a relief.
1 Like
I’ma vivager
I don’t know that fandom but enjoy.
1 Like
Prisma learned you last, so we can’t conclusively say you neighbour an evil player, but it’s known at this point in v!May worlds.
Jarek would have to be the Demon if you’re good, and vice versa. Kiiruma gained your ability but nothing happened when Pigeon is confirmed good and Moll is neutral. This means either Kiiruma or Moll would need to be evil; and always the former if Bionic was good.
(I think) this means Nuto is also confirmed good using publicly available information, correct? Can somebody check my logic?
It’s too light out
Drv3 quote
"We narrowed it down to two people, and one of those two is the culprit, right? Since we don’t have to randomly accuse each other, finding the truth just got much easier. So let’s find the truth with a more effective method.”
"If one of them is the culprit, then the innocent one should know who the guilty one is. Right? Because if you know you’re not the culprit, then you can just accuse the other person. Which means there is one person among us who definitely knows who the culprit is.”
“To that someone who knows… do your best to convince us! Work harder! Have the two argue for their innocence! That’s how we’ll decide our culprit! If you’re planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically. Only then will they reveal their true self as a liar — hiding beneath layer of deceit!”
“If we want to find the liar, I suggest that the two suspects argue against each other. No more pointless deductions! All we need is for them to fight for their lives! So let’s host an argument that’s totally-not-boring-but-super-fun! We’ll catch the culprit in their lies when we find a contradiction! We’ll scare the culprit until they screw up! A hot debate to smoke out the liar!”
- Kokichi Ouma
You should’ve slept sooner.
1 Like
I’ve seen that name in many contexts
I can’t take it seriously anymore xD
1 Like
In order for Nuto to be evil, one of Pandora/May/Jarek also have to be evil due to the End’s prevalence. Kiiruma gained May’s ability and yet didn’t kill anybody over there. Nuto can only be evil if May is also evil, as Kiiruma said yesterday.