What about your wazza vote was so special it’s beyond criticism
I have no idea what this means
Eh, I could be reading into things a bit too much but just something feels off there.
nya~
1 Like
it says theres penalties for claiming your person but can we hypoclaim one specific user for no reason. surely that would bypass it
omg slay bestie what drugs
1 out of 3 is a very inaccurate method in a 58 player game.
Big F Moment
You’re joking right?
can you quote where he said that
I wanted to go to a coke house but my friends wouldn’t let me
all im saying is itd be very funny if we all claimed zorvo
why would you do that
this is old but this is also basically why i don’t post full readlists very often
because i don’t want to look at them postgame and cringe when they’re extremely fucking bad
if my reads are all over the place like they are now then it’s hard to objectively measure how good / bad i play and i can say "well ackshually i suspected X in post #3248 
" when someone calls me bad
2 Likes
absolutely not
Yeah it’s a big rib played on you.
I have a red check on Kiiruma so obviously he can’t be a cop because a wolf cop makes no sense
Nyahuh
like, if we have a 3p game with 1 wolf, it doesn’t mean anything if you go “I think C and B are wolves”; you’d have to actually have a read there, otherwise you’re just stating the numbers of whats in the game.
I’m not saying it’s beyond criticism
I’m saying that it’s difficult to justify scumreading that particular vote in the circumstances I voted in
I believe I had a legitimate reason to vote Wazza (and so I did) and I can’t understand why guava can’t see that and so I’m asking them