i mean yeah but if the moderation doesn’t do anything
it’ll become pretty obvious within time
hell even a private warning can be misinterpreted that way and is often
1 Like
personally i think its Proooobably better to have a “processed” message and not distinguish between “nothing happened” and “a private warning happened”
just in terms of people’s attitudes towards it
but idk
1 Like
No. I think having a distinction between messages helps a lot because it shows that action is being taken, whether in regards to your report or to dismiss your report. A simple acknowledgement doesn’t do anything
Agreed, the reason warnings are private in the first place is to avoid shaming people, this would just make it worse. Personally I think we need less transparent moderation by also hiding temp bans since all it does imo is shame people permanently.
1 Like
what
temp bans are literally outed by discourse we can’t get around that
and its not a signup ban if the hosts don’t know and let them in
Even if they aren’t
“Hmmm, why has this person suddenly stopped posting at all after drama involving them”
1 Like
also yeah that too
what
we are talking about moderators sending the reporter a message updating on the report
He’s referring to the public moderation log thread (which is arguably a wall of shame lets be real)
2 Likes
i know lol
1 Like
imo appeals should be public but that’s not something that matters too much.
What is more important is receiving feedback on reports via private messages. Because right now that isn’t the case
This yea
2 Likes
Feels really ew to like publicly shame ppl like that, only builds resentment
1 Like
idk i dont think there’s much of a way around doing it for bans, which is the only thing they do it for anyways
1 Like
Just don’t get banned
Easy
1 Like
i dont get the tech behind it how does it work
1 Like
the moderation log?
if u click on the full version of someone’s profile you can see their ban status
and signup bans fundamentally need to be public
1 Like