What
excuses excuses
like unless thereās a crazy good reason he didnāt feel m1 was pure
i feel its very logical to think its more likely the power gets given to someone good if you give it to the players in a succeded mission
anyway team is prob me/kii/hazard (?) and the fourth ill decide later
I wantsd to get more ppl involved cuz thats more fun
Childe wants to win
I do agree what you said and about Hippo
I wantsd to get more ppl involved cuz thats more fun
Should IceT says Kiiruma is good, you can keep him and yourself. You should add two different players who you think is good, thus more trusted later on.
I see no reason to test Hippo any further tbh
I see no reason to test Hippo any further tbh
umm yeah there is a reason cuz im good and unlike everyone else playing cards close to their chest i am clearly socially good and should just be put in missions
yeah, I am still thinking we should stick to M1+1
i am clearly socially good and should just be put in missions
I wantsd to get more ppl involved cuz thats more fun
Make up your mind, man
Frost who do you think is evil in a world where you are somehow town
I do think Jarek is evil, never invite him to missions
Wild idea, we use M1+1 on second last missions. Spies need to opt fail twice if they are selected on Mission 4 right? It should be fine for Mission 3.
Assuming its still 4 players and not 5
No, thatās a 5
But M1+2 should be fine imo, if we fail mission 3.
If we succed on mission 3, M3+1 should win us the game.
I think at least 2 (if not all 3) of Chomps, Icet and Jarek are informed spies.
They all rejected M1 which was succeded in the end, and they all rejected my suggestion of M1+1 (when Jarek even highlighted that is mechanically the best option for the resistance) and in my opinion that mission should have succeded as well. But all 3 of them mysteriously approved Icetās team, when itās both a sub-optimal play, and Icet is on it with the blessing, what I thought we already agreed to be a bad thing to let someone with it on that missionā¦
But M1+2 should be fine imo, if we fail mission 3.
Oh yeah thatās no problem, kind of the same outcome I want about having two different people. Should mission 3 fail, then mission 4 is harder to fail because you need exactly two spies. At that point, it should be important to note who is suspicious, who is socially good, can the silent players be trusted for Mission 4?
At this point we arenāt testing to he honest, but trying to make a team without any spies, so we can win on mission 4.
Cuz if we fail on mission 3, we are basically screwed, there is like no way we can put 5 out of 6 resistance member on mission 5 without Merlin outing themselves.
I think IceT, Kiiruma and Hippo are all good, to put this simply. Mission 3 is still valuable information mission who can be entrusted for the last two missions.