Also I don’t see a world in which you say things like that if you’re good whatsoever.
If you’re good then you wouldn’t want to point out anything to the assassin.
Any information is harmful to give away and you’re been generally quite uncooperative with regards to things and trying to throw suspicion on those involved in the first mission despite it passing.
In the world in which you’re good you’d consider all possibilities but not mention them in thread as that’s pretty harmful too.
I’ve played games like this. It’s wonderful, grand, truly, that we’ve passed the first mission with the first team proposed, but I as a player and, well, literally everyone in this circle, knows nothing about anyone else as a result.
Generally speaking if you are an evil player and your evil teammate is in a proposition, you are happy to accept it. People don’t, because it looks odd that you accept a node that you yourself weren’t in. If you were a town, well, you’re basically just sacrificing the ability to learn anything!
You are remarkably un-paranoid about the fact that node was accepted by 2 seperate players that were out of node, despite the fact that this behaviour is inherently suspicious due to the fact they should believe that that node has a higher chance to be evil purely because they aren’t in it. Not to mention the fact that seeing what everyone (up until hammer) has to say about the game and who they would and would not put in a team is information in of itself.
“But we could be giving power to an evil by doing that!” is a non-argument given how hippo could easily have been an evil who just got lucky enough to rand being player 1.
@Marluna I’d be down for a team of something like me, you, Hip and Childe. Could sub Childe for something like Leafia or Frost or Chomps.
All I know is that so far I’ve been suspicious of how Jarek and Hazard were very quick to try and cast doubt on the first mission.
The main reason I’m not including Icet on this despite the fact that Ice could be good imo (Is in game and isn’t Jarek/Hazard) is that some people have asserted that they wish to not have Icet have the blessing and be on the mission. So we can avoid that pretty handily.
You don’t see a world in which I don’t blindly believe you because you managed to pass 1 node? If N1+1 gets rejected, then I’m not going to instantly blame the person that was the +1 if that’s what you think. If N1+1 goes well, then and only then will I actually start believing.
My friend. You’re literally saying out loud (Instead of in your rolecard) “You saying things like this makes me think you’re (X) or (Y)” which is just feeding information to the Assassin. You can and should be avoiding to give any information away in worlds in which you are good. But you don’t seem to be concerned about that.
Gawain/Morgana are the good/evil roles that pretend to be/protect the merlin player they can’t be assasinated
Sounds like I’m right. So are you the evil version or the good version?
I don’t know what to say at this point.
Sure, don’t include me on the next mission. We’ll see how that goes then since clearly Jarek thinks the smart decision is to out potential things with regards to me instead of saying things within his card.
The main point to me being correct here is that you’re acting like you know I’m not merlin. You should not be distrusting me simply because I’m questioning a proposition. I very well could be merlin who knows that prop was evil and is trying to do something about it. Making me have to explain myself invites me, as a merlin, to trip up and out that I know too much
Why would you say anything in the first place? It doesn’t make sense.
And I’m gonna say that I’m not claiming either fully because one of them is evil. And the other one of them I don’t want to claim to be as it doesn’t benefit my team smh.
Because if you’re morgana you’re actively trying to pretend to be merlin and fool townies and if you’re gawain then your role is not valuable to protect
It’s really quite simple. And if you’re morgana, you’re currently attempting to blend in and look good for the gawain player who might think you are actually merlin. You can be worried about the assassin if you like but I’m not afraid to call it how I see it
Ah yes, Merlin 1 (Jarek) and Merlin 2 (Hazard) both trying to argue that we shouldn’t necessarily trust those who’d passed the first mission to grant 2 (Instead of 1) alignment checks. Hazard didn’t understand the mechanics seemingly at first when we were discussing it but didn’t see the significance of passing vs failing it which could potentially just come from a good player who’s not understanding things and now you’re trying to do things which I see a lack of a reason to trust. Including trying to out information publicly instead of in your rolecard.
N1 +1 is optimal since N1 worked, it’s the safest choice and has what we believe to be the highest chance of being safe if we believe N1 was good. Notice that despite the fact I don’t blindly believe N1 was cleared, I’m still not trying to shut down N1 being involved in the next one anyway because that simply doesn’t go anywhere.
FYPOV I could be gawain and hazard could be merlin, or vice versa. Gawain has good reason to “trust” their 2 pings and what they’re saying.
I mean, yeah one of them is evil but the other one is the dude who knows all the evils so /shrug
Hey bestie it’s probably a good time to say to you that Gawain knows fuck all about Merlin and it’s Percival who knows about Merlin. Which gives away that you’re not paying attention to the cards all you’re trying to do is sew misinformation.
Same thing
Also the Merlin rolecard mentions Gawain, so you have proven you’re not Merlin.
The Pervical rolecard mentions knowing the identity of Merlin and to be careful of Morgana so you’ve proven you’re not Percival.
The Gawain rolecard mentions that Merlin sees them as a disguised minion of Mordred so you’ve proven you’re not Gawain.
But please, do feel free to pop off with your outing evil still.
Sorry but I don’t see how “don’t blindly trust N1” is misinformation. It’s a fact, if you blindly get trusted and you are evil then what happens is:
N1 + 1 Fails, people blame the +1
We do N1 +1 with another person, that fails. Who knows how people take that.
We now have to do 2 propositions, with 5 people in it. With N1 being polluted (but believed to be good)