I talked about Wazzaâs wallpost on Vul (P#2400) after I argued with your P#730 (P#2397).
However, the post of when you said Wazzaâs wallpost is word salad is not only from an earlier time before you went AFK around P#646, but also irrelevant to my argument against your P#730.
Basically:
You say A.
You say B.
[1700+ Posts]
I complain about B.
I agree with A.
You responded to (4) while talking about (5).
Like, Iâm just annoyed at how you reacted to the wrong stuff, and then McGuffinâed my argument with a âoh, i didnât read thatâ.
You canât base your read off of a basic analysis.
You need to read the player based on how them specifically would play and how them specifically play both alignments. Vulgard is always gonna play Townie or at least appear to be regardless of alignment.
For experienced players like him itâs easy to look Townie as wolf, so rather on looking whatâs good that he has done, look at stuff that can be bad that he has done and question or talk to them about it.
Where on earth are you getting this from
Like really
You backed down slightly on your âWind/Leafia w/wâ take when I was in the thread and here you are going at it again
Do you know Windward and/or Illweiâs meta?
Do you think it is natural for them to vote Zorvo?
Do you think their exit from Zorvoâs wagon are natural / not too sudden? (FTR, I havenât read this part yet.)
Oh no, I never scumread Zorvo
I voted him for pressure to give an explanation on why he thought Leafia and Illwei were both town, then went to sleep and completely forgot I had left my vote there.
See that doesnât make much sense to me.
Like again with the way you describing it I donât see you ever not town reading Vulgard regardless of his alignment as his play style is naturally Townie where as the opposite of Leafia whoâs is naturally Wolfy.
Can you explain to me, knowing Vulgard is that type of player, how would you read them?