∘ ☙ Kakegurui: Compulsive Gambler Mafia -- DAY THREE (10/15), BACKUP REQUIRED ❧ ∘

is gabmling just the bet thing btw? or is it smthelse?

I died like 5 hours into Day 1

I don’t think it’s a secret at this point that I like playing scum and can post pretty well as that alignment but you don’t need to oversell it, and getting paranoid of me on Day 1 isn’t actually beneficial to a town win condition

there’s the betting on someone’s alignment but also potential role abilities I guess. The deadline for the betting window is passed anyway

1 Like

I suppose I need to actually consider leafia’s alignment again that’s bothersome

1 Like

nvm the league game started brb

VOTE: Bystander

I apologise for the stall.

For context, Leafia was pushed upon since the first hour of the game, and in desperation began to soft a PR claim around midway through. Upon being called out, she claimed a specific role in an open setup where only two Town PR could exist in a highly specific array (as is standard for knight-errant).

1 Like

Gambling is a private guess that a certain player will be executed that day and flip evil. If you’re correct and successful, your ability is enhanced for a night.

Furthermore, certain abilities contain elements of randomness, which doesn’t constitute as the gamble but is nonetheless still gambling in a way.

1 Like

no

bitch :hocho:

1 Like

thank you for the compliment but i cannot accept a league player

2 Likes

this is one of thosee wild theory posts that are rarely correct but would be damn impressive if it was

2 Likes

VOTE: leafia

no… i’m just a girl who only plays girly pop supports :disappointed:

what happened to the shade on ppl for voting league cause she claimed mason lol?

VOTE: catbae

0 thoughts on leafs fyi

1 Like

don’t vote me :fish:

i will put explosives on u :shrimp:

1 Like

(irl)

tutu outtedbfornlurking

1 Like

I was not shading magnus for voting leafia, I had a disagreement with their statement about marluna and thought they were leaving a vote on what was essentially a dead wagon. After that, they informed me Leafia had retracted the claim, so any dispute I had was invalid.

I went back, reread, compared th early claim to the game magnus linked, decided to move my vote back.

Why wouldn’t I change my mind when presented with new informtion? I know you read at like a 5th grade level but it’s not actually hard to see I am reating to something that was said to me and old assumptions are no longer valid.