So that doesn’t count as an execution?
they ORDERED THEIR EXECUTION They got EXECUTED
That’s funny.
Did they win?
Explains one of the trollboxes, and probably a potential source of framing as well
Host Announcement
To clarify mechanical interactions:
- A fool only wins when executed by the court (voted out).
- Madman’s folly only works when it wins
4 Likes
they lost
amazing
3 Likes
It was not hard to come to the conclusion that we were dealing with a fool, but you were scum reading the player and associating them with another player. If this fool had not acted out there is a good chance our wonderful town would have voted for our dear fool friend. Now, a fool has great potential to harm our wonderful town and scum know this. It was curious that you were soft defending Nashrah against claims of them being a harmful neutral, while also calling them scum.
This is precisely the type of thing that scum would cheer for.
A fool is a very harmful neutral. You should know that, so you trying to sanitize the fool’s name makes me suspect you.
aww now i just feel bad
haha get fucked you were scummy and you got chopped but you still lost i call this a skill issue 
1 Like
In hindsight hardclaiming chancellor and threatening to kill the king was most likely an attempt to get to specifically get OE’d by the king assuming it’d count as an execution and they’d win
1 Like
Seeing as Samarie is my top suspect that is where I cast my ballet. VOTE: Samarie
To be honest this fool kill is a dead end for me. Very good to get rid of, but there’s not much to say about it, other than the fact that the OE was successfully used in a very effective way - but the slot was such an obvious shot that if that wasn’t OE’d I’d be suspicious immediately.
What purpose would defending the Fool have for a supposed evil though. With that angle they have no justifiable reason to vote the Fool out or push them so they can’t do much with them. Except for fruitlessly saving them from the vig shot grave they were blatantly digging themselves into, but I would expect scum to realise a lost cause when they see it and not put themselves in the limelight to defend it.
that was not me defending Nashrah. but i understand the way you are coming from. if anything that was me grilling august for something similar to you grilling me daan. i didnt like that august had it stuck in his head that Nashrah was definitly a harmful neutral and when i grilled them about it they didnt really give much of a reply.
this is riding on the fact i knew they were fool. and also riding on the fact i was asking others to push nashrah.
the line that you posted saying “i think nashrah is straight scum” was ripped out of a longer wall where i was saying if Kaiser flipped scum Narshrah probably is as well.
its a fun theory but it feels patched together with lose thread
if i was following your line of though Daan.
then why would i ride nashrah’s execution on someone else being scum
wait. hold on i just re read this again. are you suspecting me for pushing or defending the fool?
VOTE: Levi
Alright bye for now
By sanitizing the fool you can more effectively get them voted. The fool being executed by the ballet ensures our king dies. If our king dies that is 2 more dead players, which makes the game state harder to win for town. The ensuing chaos allows for a scum king to get elected, which would not lose their abilities.
that would be correct, but I acknowledged that as well.
I am suspecting you of both pushing the fool to get them executed by ballet, but also defending the fool by sanitizing them. What I mean by sanitizing is that it looks like you were trying to make it look like they was not the fool.
With that being said I must retire for the evening.
There’s too much KP in this game that could potentially exist to safely defend a potential fool from being shot but still voted out by town, in my opinion.
ahhh. No you fully misinterpreted my train of thoughts in those messages. i was accusing why August was sold they were harmful neutral. i was still in the world they could be “evil” which in this world can be cult or unseen
again found with this line of thinking