Legacy Forum of Lies 2 - The Psychopathic King, Possessor, and Alchemist win

why the vote on levi?

They havenā€™t produced enough content so consider this vote some pressure. Iā€™m considering you two going at it as T/T for now - I think your accuser actually believes they have something and I think youā€™re likely not doing what they said youā€™ve done.

But no, really, I will be leaving now.

2 Likes

Im heading to sleep
Late for me
I only got one ISO done but ill get the rest done overnight and wall post in the morning
My vote is staying, unless I wake up before SOD. Gn

1 Like

Fair

In regards to me calling myself out: thatā€™s an illusion. The quote you gave thatā€™s apparently related is like the proof of working youā€™d give on a math test, except itā€™s showing the weird complications that arise if the premises you laid out are true. There is no logical merit in the equivalency you made about my treatment of you and Nashrah, so functionally itā€™s no different from you saying that Iā€™m a wolf for no reason unless I already trust you as a person.

Iā€™m not sure how you came to this conclusion since my use of language has been pretty clear.

i am sorry this just reads like a jumble of words to me. i know your trying to do a bit but i cant understand you when you type like this

this makes this sentence so much funnier

No it wouldnā€™t be a waste.

Getting killed by a town vig N1 every game isnā€™t exactly something to brag about.

I have a hunch as to Nashā€™s identity now and if Iā€™m right on who it is, me shooting him.N1 will always help the town, no matter what. That and if Iā€™m right about who it is, theyā€™re never town here.

If you can confuse me with a lot of big words like this and try.to dissuade me from wolfreading you, youā€™ve got another thing coming.

I find that the way ypu post makes me think you just want to appear all helpful and solvy without actually doing any work because it makes me think you donā€™t want people to understand what youā€™re saying.

You have my blessing too.

Kaiser, why would you speak like that as town? Iā€™ve also already explained why youā€™d do what youā€™re doing as a wolf.

Yup. Knew he couldnā€™t be town. Also, for taking out Nashrah, I think Iā€™ll let our king decide who I shoot tonight. I trust him a bit more now after all. I doubt a wolf wouldā€™ve had Nash executed via that method.

Wrong. Nash was dangerousand we gained a lot from their death. Also, Iā€™m guessing Nash was Seth.

Iā€™m fine with that. VOTE: Samaria

If you think you can

you spelt my name wrong

Oops. UNVOTE

Finding the correction to be somewhat villagery so hesitant to put my vote there for now. I think Iā€™ll head to bed and sleep on it. Good night everyone.

Iā€™ll be back in a bit after i have a break from online. or if Kaiser comes back and cleans up the message he sent me.

i am sorry i am not being really helpful today. its been a messy weekend for me XD. iā€™ll come back with a fresh look in an hour or 2. have a good one folks!

Why would I speak like what as town? I am town, and Iā€™m speaking this way because itā€™s who I am. I donā€™t know what to say about the things youā€™re claiming Iā€™m doing other than none of it is grounded in reality whatsoever and you are not providing premises or conclusions that justify any of it. Normally thatā€™s where the discussion starts and weā€™d just talk about things until something happens that makes us want to take some sort of action, but Iā€™m running in to a problem, because youā€™re presupposing I want to confuse you, I want to appear to be gamesolving without actually gamesolving, I want to sound smart, Iā€™m beating around the bush, I donā€™t want people to understand what Iā€™m sayingā€¦ A lot of the things youā€™re saying to discredit me must inherently come from a place of bad faith, and itā€™s all self-referential.

Your methodology is the problem. I canā€™t even critique what youā€™re saying because the essence of it is completely obfuscated by design, Iā€™m not meant to be able to. No, I donā€™t want to confuse you and yes this is genuine gamesolving, but itā€™s not worth me saying either of those things because you would need a comically absurd amount of information to believe otherwise in good faith. I donā€™t need to want to confuse you as wolf and I donā€™t need to fake gamesolve while wanting to appear gamesolvey as wolf either, they are not the wolfā€™s win conditions. Even if you could prove I needed to want both of those things, youā€™d still need to prove I was wolf independent of my motivations. Even if you could prove that, youā€™d still need to prove it was what Iā€™d actually do independent of that. Itā€™s so far removed from being reasonable that Iā€™m feeling itā€™s probably counterproductive to talk to you at all.

That will be good idea to recollect our thoughts now Nashrah is dead.

1 Like

Iā€™m struggling to offer assistance without meta (identity) and incentive, but for what itā€™s worth I couldnā€™t find myself townreading any of these folk:

Samarie, Daan, Levi, Pav, Karin, BlackKalev

@Henryk Ping me with instructions for my night action before EoD, my liege. Otherwise I will either use Doctor on a consensus townread or Iā€™ll holster in case there are any PGOs or such, Iā€™d need to read the roles to see if I could be endangered by doctoring someone.

Kaiser popped in and never cleared this with me cool

gonna be completely honest. forgot he was here

1 Like

I am open for questions while i read stuff

For the record believing Iā€™m wolf for any reason is fine, even bad ones. Suggesting Iā€™m doing something for any reason is also fine. Representing your belief as being more or less confident than it is in actuality is also fine as long as you donā€™t have to distort the truth of your belief to accomplish that.

You stated that the way I post makes you think I donā€™t want people to understand what Iā€™m saying. No offense but thatā€™s an absolutely insane thing to think about someone you donā€™t know well, Iā€™d question whether the average person knows even a single person well enough to declare they WANT to be misunderstood and have good reasons for doing so. Is it something you could consider? Sure but in this case it observably has extended past being just a consideration because youā€™re telling others itā€™s who you think I am. It feels a lot simpler for me to conclude you donā€™t believe anything youā€™re saying. Interestingly I donā€™t think youā€™ve accused me of not believing my own input even once between all the other way more specific things youā€™ve suggested. I am going to accuse you of not believing your own input in regards to me because I canā€™t identify even a single way for you to come to believe all of it naturally that doesnā€™t involve you having some form of precognition.