We can see you in the morning.
1 Like
I have definitely learnt this
just forgot it
1 Like
Alright, after Hazardâs kill, I kinda side eye Magnus because it could be an attempt to clear themselves by saying âhey I was already scum reading him why would I kill him?â.
Also, because the point where we are at the game Iâm forced to be sus of Lucifer, gar and lemon as well. I donât trust anyone except Gorta.
I mean, yeah? If Iâm evil, given what I said after Hazardâs death, thatâs exactly what I would have to be doing here. Itâs not an uncommon trick. You are entirely valid for recognising this as a scumtell, because it is for a lot of people.
@WizKvothe if youâre still around, Iâm up to real time with you. I had a couple questions.
Youâve expressed that you donât trust anyone except Gorta, presumably because heâs been cleared. This is, in my opinion, a mistake because it suggests you havenât formed any confident social reads. If you had to place your trust in one other person, who would it be?
I think If I have to trust one more it would be lemon because I think they have done enough of the solvy thing which makes me trust them a bit.
Also, I said I donât trust anyone in general because at this point anyone could be a wolf.
That being said, I have certain questions too to figure out the problem
First to, @LuciferChaos I guess you never said whom did you motion detect last phase, can you tell us who that was?
Second to @Lemonfairy I see your presence a little less as compared to early game, is there a reason you mentioned for this which Iâm missing?
How do you know that?
these are both bad reasons to trust someone unconditionally
the garfooled reasoning is a bit better than the Magnus reasoning because Magnus can solve as a wolf
I asked the hosts whether items could be shared between Mafia when Garfooled freaked out earlier.
Anyone can solve as a wolf.
Maybe Iâm missing something but was it gar or kiruma who mech outed Eliza? I thought it was kiru because of which they were even being pushed by icet and lemon.
exactly why itâs bad reasoning
1 Like
Garfooled claimed failing to heal Litten the night he died, which incriminated Eliza because she also had an item. After going silent for a while, she returned and claimed to roleblock Gar, which opened the door for them to both be Town⌠except she was executed anyway.
If a person seems to be solving in a genuine and honest manner, then itâs not a bad reason to trust someone. I assumed that was Lemonâs point.
Ah! Yeah I remember now. But there is a possibility that both were wolves infact. Because gar had an item he had to claim something so he claimed doc but still after that the kill went through which made him say that he was rbed. Now Eliza too had an item so she claimed to rb gar. While in reality, possibly both of them had wolf items and they used them one way or other.
Plus the fact, Eliza took time to say that she rb gar opens the possibility that both of them later cooked up this story in the wolf sub after gar claimed to be rbed.
Ik this is just a scenerio but I donât think this should give gar a free pass.
Edit: Also, I think it was actually kiru who proposed the Eliza as strongman theory not gar so they planned it after kiru pointed that out.
I think if Garfooled and Eliza were aligned, they wouldâve tried to run with the world that Litten roleblocked Gar, or else have Eliza claim she didnât roleblock Gar and just have whichever one lives look good off the otherâs flip. Outing Eliza for no real reason doesnât feel fun.
HmmâŚthis kinda makes sense now that I see gar suggesting Eliza can be a wolf. I didnât consider the litten scenerio here.