Look, I’m just stating things like I see them. Find a real reason to scumread me if you want to scumread me but I don’t think you’ll be able to.
I only have reads on 6 people
“I’m not being toxic”
(^ this one might be a joke)
[quote=“Brakuren, post:96, topic:7136, full:true”]
3 Likes
Yes, and everyone that has disagreed with you besides Guava you wolfread. You’ve also been antagonizing people almost nonstop.
- this isnt even including the posts that are questionable
- we are less than 12 hours into day 1
- I dived through brakuren’s entire iso for this
they’re probably scum
VOTE: Brakuren
1 Like
also oop the quote broke
1 Like
Thanks Eliza. All that is extremely toxic Brak. Even worse than Crescent was in fact.
1 Like
most of those are still SOMEWHAT questionable
but its pretty obvious when u compile them all together
1 Like
5 out of 145 posts crazy
I mean yeah you post a lot of shit
1 Like
You’re still being toxic
I don’t think you’re being AS toxic as Leafia said but you’re still being toxic
3 Likes
There’s even more than that and even only that is 5 more than you should have. I think you owe people an apology for your toxicity.
1 Like
This is the only one I would consider toxic, and it’s only phrased this way because it’s a genuinely terrible thought
“Who invited you to this conversation” is a pretty classic toxic phrase imo
Im not even talking to him like
yes.
There is far more tactful ways to say “im not talking to you”
That’s a lie. If you dived into my entire ISO you would know why im doing this :)
Benefit of having information checks in your posts is you can call BS on people having read what you said
it was a very quick skim
and also I was specifically looking for toxic things because there’s no way you say “I’m not being toxic” and have it be true