I’m a really fast reader and decided “I’ll skim, then read, then decide if it’s worth my time”
I skipped the read and then decide if it’s worth my time part, so I read the top quickly, realised it wasn’t worth much, read the 2nd paragraph and wanted to comment on it a bit
1 Like
anyway
/vote Silviu
Hopping onto pressure
sayeth his name and he shall appeareth or somethingthefuck i dunno
2 Likes
Need to go to sleep soon and also playing chess.
But what I will say is Litten literally missed the entire point of me reinterating Leafia’s points of view.
What was the point?
Look for the post where I said Leafia is being investigative, initial push on YBW and then Leafia proceeded to retract it.
I believe Leafia’s townie from the way they are handling it while maintaining their investigative behavior.
This post?
Before that
You never said the word investigative before that point
quotes and things
this feels a little partnery between leaf and kiiruma - like leaf is looking for a reason to shade her partner early game so people don’t think they’re scummates
…but I’ve also misread leaf in literally every game we’ve played together (the one game I thought she was town was the one scum game 
), so I’m gonna wait on that read until someone more qualified gives an opinion
I feel like this spews something
but I’m not sure what
mostly putting this here so I can find it again
I DID THAT TOO
…
bold move
I expect you to have a read on me after I post 2 things too or else I’m gonna feel left out smh
this post was… not at all related to what it replied to
probably not ai but weird
here’s the post it replied to:
so either leaf is wolf trying too hard to interact with people and is taking them too seriously
or leaf is town trying to interact with people and scumhunt and took blizer too seriously
…so in conclusion, I hate reading leafia
gut tells me probably not w/w with blizer because of that interaction but whatever
shhhhhhh
don’t have too many thoughts about people other than leaf
and even then my thoughts about leaf are inconclusive
yay
1 Like
Sorry that I can’t lead you to find it right now.
Goodnight for now.
Oh wait, I think I found it
wait where
Not trying to be nitpicky or anything, but there isn’t for me- and I dont consider myself the type of person who pushes people knowing my reasoning has no correct point in it. if i did, id personally be doing that in bad faith
I felt offput at wazza clearly softdefending and then hopping right on silviu a few posts after, but w/e
fairly scummy to point this out imo
no reason to point it out and call it weird if it isnt ai. this feels like shade.
same at that last line, but you arent going to find a difference, leafia replies to basically everyone
imo im not really liking squirrel rn
/vote squirrel @Host_Account_1
replying to nai stuff is fine imo as i do it all the time but like
indirectly putting a hint that you find something weird isnt too far off of calling it scummy and its just actively wolfy to do when youre trying to imply you arent doing that by calling the post nai lol
I wasn’t defending Silviu
I was pointing out facts and logic
On the contrary I actually like that Squirrel is giving thoughts, even if they’re inconclusive, because it shows he’s actually reading the thread
2 Likes
Since when have your standards devolved to “reading the thread is townie”
1 Like
how does squirrel having proof of reading the thread make you like him? what makes scum unable to do any of this?
1 Like
I mean specifically because he’s quoting stuff and not just coming in and making wishy washy reads with no evidence
At least he has quotes that he’s commenting on