Im down to chop that role that doesnt let us nominate (if it doesnt). I would very much like to be in control of my votes
ill be voting people not voting the travellers
Something to note is; the story tellers are required to nominate someone of the opposite alignment of the bishop
nevermind bishop prevents it
Not to mention, you can vote those people! The story tellers will take votes into considerations when they decide who to nominate.
someone likes kiiruma around
We should just exile the travelelrs today itās the optimal play
So i suppose its a risk reward, like we can get pseudo parity cop checks (but we cant know their alignment). But in return we lose control of our nominations(right? We literally cant nominate anyone?)
I killed them twice as evil.
explain why
exiling the bishop before we even get the information of who gets nominated doesnt sound great
You canāt, but you can vote for people; and the story tellers will likely nominate people who the town wants to kill
An evil traveller swings the game more than a good one, and itās probably 1 of each alignment
Thatās boring.
Do you wish to be my last whisper of the day?
Oh nice, they will be townsiding? Props to whoever slipped that 20 to snowe under the table before the game
People defending travellers are probably scum
If they donāt town side, we exile the traveler, which is unfun for the traveler, which is why the story tellers nominate people who we want.
not much, just a bit scummy