Serpent and the Swordsman - Day 4 [6/15]

[Atlas]

what is that
thing

[Atlas]

that liked my damn post

[May]

Meow

[baker]

@Atlas

im the gambler, i had baker as the pixie

@L.una
is this true?

[May]

I am ill right now

[L.una]

Think it’s a fly, I killed it.

[L.una]

Why wouldn’t it be

[May]

I feel like I am in a spike trap and not in a fun way

[baker]

@L.una

Why wouldn’t it be

so you lied about atlas gambler checking you

[May]

Otter posts today are giving up and she doesn’t give up

[Artemis]

No, they did. They meant they thought you were the pixie.

[L.una]

I wanted to see if you claimed pixie who became gambler.

[Artemis]

Unless Atlas lied to me too.

[Magnus]

@Atlas

false. we know this because of tutuu’s account that they told me magnus’ claims, and we know from the transcript that i, and likely, others, had said magnus is lying

If Otter had merely seen others claiming around the circle that I had been fakeclaiming, even though they believed I had claimed as such to them privately, the “all agreed” statement wouldn’t be cohesive. This implies a discussion and a communal opinion getting reached, with multiple people,

@Atlas

for a moment, yes. they don’t believe it anymore, i don’t think, after their own admission and including them in scumworlds

Nevertheless, you did not leave the chat with the same opinion, continuously forcing pressure onto a slot that Litten didn’t want further interaction with. From my perception, you’re usually on the same wavelength as other villagers, which is why it’s fun to solve with you. In the previous game, just chatting for an hour privately about the gamestate.

Furthermore, the description you gave Baker’s behaviour in said whisper did not resemble “obvious evil” text.

@Atlas

then baker said we had the same scumreads
and then never elaborated

---

@Atlas

i re-evaulted and thought through all of those. my read on silviu hasn’t even been “suspicion”, and may was one pairing. hazard is good by poe, i believe.

I added Silviu specifically of a single line you had about “wanting to follow-up on bad behaviour”. Reevaluating isn’t the problem, it’s an odd lack of direction even into the beginning of D2.

@Atlas

or, the evil team was paying a lot of attention, and wanted to throw suspicion on who i was gambling, as i did go around claiming it. baker would’ve been able to see that too, and you would’ve assassined me for just being me

In which case the players in your D1 whispers should be suspect to you, presumably Baker. In which case this may have falsely tailored your perception of their slot…
Are you still claiming Gambler?

@Atlas

not true. me and l.una were lying. i don’t post saul goodman gifs upon being suspected

Irrelevant. You were still suspected elsewhere. You’re always suspected elsewhere, by the nature of being you.

@Atlas

thats unrelated.

Assuming the Demon wouldn’t be nominated on the first day, sure.

[May]

It’s still possible otter is good but I highly doubt it because her claim is suspect and she’s socially just. In. Antispew

[Silviu200530]

Ill feature flocks together

[baker]

well l.una asked me to check them as mayor yesterday and today atlas died and i lived. this makes them think i am evil but in reality THERE WAS NO POINT IN CHECKING ME

[Atlas]

@Magnus

Furthermore, the description you gave Baker’s behaviour in said whisper did not resemble “obvious evil” text.

what description?

[Artemis]

What part about her claim is suspect? We know there’s an Artist, and the suspected other Pixie is no longer claiming such.

[baker]

ESPECIALLY WHEN I RESPECTED ATLAS CLAIM ALL ALONG