Singers FM - Day 4 [10/20] - Thread 1

[Gocj]

Conclusion for zug: I would expect them to do something townie by now but they havent which is odd i think, its just full of nothing of themselves

[Gocj]

Besides the semantics and phrasing discussions

[Bionic]

i won’t change my mind beacuse im still kinda feeling a wolf on this, don’t wanna have a repeat of a previous game where i changed my mind

[SirDerpsAlot]

@Zugzwang

like, from what I remember of Derps their stuff so far isn’t out of character, if I ignore the lack of stuff
but it feels strange they haven’t done more

I swear someone says this like every damn game

[Zugzwang]

@Gocj

I think here starts a series of zug either miss interpreting messages or arguing for semantics n shits that i can see later, this i already debunked tl:dr being that i didnt back off of it.

@Gocj

Here is the semantics thing that i mentioned before, this whole jarek zug thing is just zug arguing about semantics and phrasing, something somebody else called out on guava before but seemingly abscent on here from what i remember

@Zugzwang

I get your argument saying I misrepresented it, but which sounds more likely:

“v!Zugzwang interpreting something differently than you”
or
“w!Zugzwang intentionally mispresenting an interaction to shade Gocj, but then not actually pushing them for it, despite there being plenty of more realistic reasons w!Zugzwang could shade Gocj for”

[Gocj]

Going more on the derpy thingy lexy had a full ass pharaphraph and zug was like “yeah they arent the same”

[SirDerpsAlot]

it has occured to me that was like 1000 posts ago and I have no idea why my discourse was even their

[Gocj]

You are intentionally entering wifom ew

[Zugzwang]

@Gocj

Catbae did give a reason in the post with the vote blegh

they gave reasons, yes
I said “~nothing” meaning essentially nothing
because I just debunked those reasons, and felt they were very weak

[Gocj]

VOTE: zug

[Gocj]

I mean you really didnt

[Zugzwang]

no?? I’m showing that I’ve obviously misinterpreted it genuinely, because misrepresenting it on purpose is ???

[Zugzwang]

@Zugzwang

@catbae

gocj bit

I found it wolfy, so I mentioned it
I get your argument saying I misrepresented it, but which sounds more likely:

“v!Zugzwang interpreting something differently than you”
or
“w!Zugzwang intentionally mispresenting an interaction to shade Gocj, but then not actually pushing them for it, despite there being plenty of more realistic reasons w!Zugzwang could shade Gocj for”

@catbae

your approach to the sirderps vote struck as maybe opportunistic

that vote was primarily for pressure
which you asked for:

@catbae

i would imagine someone who doesn’t play that often will probably lurk a lot, but i wouldn’t object to wagoning derps and seeing if it lights a fire under him

as it is vote count is too empty, more people ought to be throwing votes down

so no, it’s not opportunistic

I did

[Gocj]

You do realize that whole message is a wifom case

[Hazardwaste]

He he Votes are now
5
4
3
2
1

[Gocj]

The original vote message

[Gocj]

Where catbae placed the vote

[Hazardwaste]

on me :( which i understand why i havent been the most helpful.
so imma try and wake myself up a bit now prac is “finished”

[SirDerpsAlot]

does anyone want anything before I leave my computer and probably get distracted for the rest of the day

[Gocj]

The zug vote