I claimed serial killer, not shelly de killer. You brought that up.
Game so ez lol
soā¦ .you claiming Serial killer was actually you claiming masons?
He cant fool me, thats for sure. That is why I am not reacting with a vote to him back at day 1, since achro also claimed it for some reason.
It is too funny that SK and Mafia might have dogpiled on Achro for that claim, but too afraid on Magnus.
I donāt know why that didnāt happen, I have no wolfchat to confirm that
no i think i am goneā¦ i am gonna go back to work
1 Like
No? I claimed SK because it was fun, it was an easy way to gather reactions, it would possibly clear me as not SK in the eyes of people who know I hate neutrals claiming immediately, and there was no actual downside.
I think he is flabbergasted that I knew over such small insufficient detail.
What is Sherlock used to say, that there is no impossible evidence left, no matter how improbable, remains the truth?
If you thought Achro and I were softclaiming Masons, why did you say earlier that there was no reason to kill either of us?
That would be such a strong Masonry.
I just let that claims slide, and I made it myself clear in my opener
Hold on.
Nobody else thinks this, right?
1 Like
Donāt ask me how others think, I am no telepathic medium.
Everyone may react differently
So the answer is that you supposedly didnāt see my initial Mason claim, but you picked up on what people were saying now about it, right?
Weird.
1 Like
āNowā?
Now as in āat the start of this conversationā.
This is what I mentioned
ā¦I can confirm now that none of that was intentional and I was just in the AA mood.
I stil end up deducing it correctly, despite that
Well played. Iād have to ask for your read on the situation now that youāve heard the full story.
Yeah, I think its just fortunate that scum missed it
Key points if you will