The Binding of Isaac Mad17 - Game Over (Terminal Lucidity) [Mafia Win]

Two players have been lying about their claims.

The only way its possible, is when JOAT used their rolecop at Night 1 and kill that target by Night 2 to cover their tracks.

I for one, cannot be JOAT, N2 Vigilante or N1/N3 Roleblocker.

And I surely havent proved I am N2/N4 Jailkeeper.

Or rather, this is not proven I did blocked Phraze.

And when me and sheep claim to be using actions and you claim to be blocked, then it doesn’t change the outcome.

I am smart enough to expect some kind of deception.

And I would be smart enough to not risk and execute you, Wind.

I am smart enough to realize rule of three in me/Sheep/Wind if that scenario occurs but why end here?

I rather let wolves dissolve that rule of three, not town.

Because I refuse to give in wolf demand to vote in this rule of three wagons.

Not until final 3

keep yapping

Rude

(I am not refuting I am not hypocrite saying this, okay?)

@Phraze Executing Bionic and flipping mafia will prove my innocence regarding WindWaryAway being blocked at N4, it will be still 50/50 between them.

Unlike sheep, both me and Wind were unable to resolve through actions.

I believe Sheep did indeed roleblock me N2 and its also possible for Wind to have used strongman as Mafia, he specifically asked me not to roleblock him during N2.

Sheep’s action is town consensus thing to do at that time.

So what does this tell you?

To me, Bystander is trying too hard to get me executed, this so called theatre on Day 4 is just sugar on cream to sell you this narrative.

I havent been distancing Bystander, thats lot of nonsense.

I am just not sold on Phraze’s claim.

Am I overlooked on this vote?

Frostwolf103 (3): Bionic, bystander, Apocryphal
Phraze (3): Creature, WindwardAway, Frostwolf103
Bionic (1): sheepsaysmeep

Not Voting (3): LittleLee, Luxy, Phraze