@Gyrlander does.
1 Like
I wouldnāt fault min for that
I came in to see you and Sabi pushing each other and also did not read anything before that since the last time I popped in
You donāt have to vote people you disagree with. At this point itās getting tilting. There is zero reason for you to kill me over wind today 
2 Likes
The image is a middle fingerā¦
1 Like
Iām kidding
Ok. So. This means that if anti-claim exists, there is no wolf in your chat cause youād be dead already.
Have yall Google your flavor to. Read the wiki page on it 
Thatās what I believe, yes
I associate you hard with Heisenberg
I already know everything about umineko so
Although if they have an anticlaim in the form of a rolecop and not a kill, yeah maybe that exists. Idk.
Do you have an idea what their hood could mean? @WindwardAway or @BradLand can you out either of your flavors
Yah but that would be no anti-claim, anti claim is designed to punish claims. There is no absolute punishment greater than death.
I advice against this
You were literally reading me town over wind before I came into thread. Cut the bullshit and stop voting people because of completely non ai things and actually do something before complaining that Iām trying to āskip discussionā when the discussion is you making exclusively snap votes instead of actually factoring everything youāve seen in your reads.
Why would I care about flavor
At this point I guess I can claim since Iāll flip anyway
But Iām just hesitating because it outs Brad and Jack too
Instead of unintentionally or intentionally making people possibly get shot, just, solve based off of mech or social deduction lol
Idk I think wolves gaining a rolecop on someone who claims their role is a form of anticlaim
Because if the person claims a fake role then the wolves know its fake since they donāt get a rolecop shot
Iāve seen that mechanic in other games