Bump
4 Likes
can you leak how many people have applied
i’m quite curious
2 Likes
more than -1
less than 484
2 Likes
did you really need to use your 1896th mediocre-at-best post of the year on this?
6 Likes
ive definitely had more than 0 mediocre posts between yesterday and today arcy
2 Likes
those were worse than mediocre
2 Likes
but you said “mediocre-at-best” which would imply that “worse than mediocre” would fall under the same ballpark
1 Like
1 Like
>asks katze a question for the sole purpose of making fun of them when they respond
gigachad
4 Likes
no
but its more than we expected
1 Like
ok but why
bcuz i said so
why did you say so
i want to respect all the applicants’ privacy and don’t want there to be any way to sort out the people who applied who don’t want that to be public knowledge
even if its just giving a number
2 Likes
you could have said that the first time
1 Like
it was more than 5 words and i figured it was obvious 
2 Likes
sorry it wasn’t obvious to me because i’m a dummy
2 Likes
poor wittle arcy
6 Likes
The real reason Chloe doesn’t want to say is because the actual number is only 1 person (arctic) and she told him the reason he was rejected was cuz there were more qualified candidates
12 Likes
i haven’t applied