hm. that’s fair
many things to discuss in our group chat
I’ve found that on average, they do worse with sadism
which sounds paradoxical but
also the goal is to match so if people get really close but take longer that’s better than not taking longer and not getting as close
It just sounds like this.
Imagine if team 1 took one turn on the first round, and team 2 took ten turns but gained three sadism in the process.
The second team has undeniably done worse that round, but according to my understanding, if they tied next round then the second team would progress over the first one.
Oh
yeah fair
if it were Up To Me I’d do something like:
- number of turns taken this round
- first tiebreaker: current round number of 2/3 matches
- second tiebreaker: previous round number of turns (lower wins)
- third tiebreaker: previous round number of 2/3 matches
and Surely you can’t need more tiebreakers than that
after that we do a coinflip
theres a sadism mechanic? wasnt that just u guys messing around about how hard the game is?
Pandora had a secret round ruling.
a sadism mechanic is we the host reward people with sadism points for getring 2 but not getting all three
I too was confused
oh i didnt read hehe
what this means? leaving a partial match?
aahhh i see
So theoritically if someone submited litten litten may then they get a sadism point
the words were kitten cat polarized
They only get sadism points when they unmatch.
what