This just sounds like a massive skill issue
Oh my god is that ElizaThePsycho?
the ban is a villainisation
youâre saying âthis person isnât safeâ
and the way you described her was basically saying she lacked common empathy because she would do something like that which in and of itself feels like a villainisation
tell me if im wrong about any of this
please dont twist what I said. I tried to make it clear I donât know how to feel about it because of my dettatchment from myself at that time, especially with my difficulty remembering that time
and, please only use she/her for me !! i prefer it significantly
if you dont actively dispute it you are currently not disputing it
take it to dms and argue it out there
I love this game
(<â lying)
this argument doesnt hold water
she said she has dissociation issues of the time so you cant use her lack of dispute to support either conclusion
this is based on the assumption âif she felt it was wrong she would dispute itâ but she explicitly said she has trouble thinking about it or remembering it
i will if a mod tells me to
and yet it doesnât make what i said false
all i said was that she didnât dispute it
because she didnât
yes its not wrong but you using it to support your argument here is fallacious
no it isnât
if story decides she wants to dispute her ban and campaign against mu mods then you can go buck wild and crusade in her name
youâre going to war for a neutral (undecided) nation
marl you are using it in a way which makes it sound like Iâm on your side here. Which Iâm not. Just because its correct on technicality does not make it correct in the context youâre using it
hey yea take this to DMs if you want to continue please
i dont want to censor you guys but this is a very heavy topic and is making people quite uncomfortable
im going to war not to get her unbanned from MU
im going to war to get you to see that youâre degrading me to my face
again no i never implied you were on my side
i simply said you did not dispute your ban
i made my funny little meme yesterday what HAPPENED
I believe in rehabilitation, especially for individuals who have demonstrated a certain level of intelligence and functional capability.
I understand that the mods may not have the resources to individually assess every perma case. Your disagreement seems to stem from a lack of hope in the potential rehabilitation of a confused individual here, whereas I believe that with enough effort, such confusions could be treated- instead of putting the head of Alice up on a stake as a scarecrow. Iâm suggesting that the hard stance on evaluating a person solely based on their actions could be enhanced, and thatâs the main point I want to convey. Itâs easy to obliterate, erase, or eliminate an existence, but it doesnât necessarily make a functional order âgoodâ; it simply maintains a certain status quo which isnât progressive.