I did no such things
What’s crazy is how you’re assuming that I can’t possibly be the Drunk.
Or that Ash can’t be the poisoner.
Leafia. Litten neighbours the poisoned Virgin and knows of the undertaker thanks to Icet.
It’s not rocket science.
Litten poisoned their neighbour D1, who happens to be the Virgin.
And then thanks to information they’d gained, poisoned the Undertaker afterwards.
How do you know he was poisoned though? Why aren’t you considering the possibility that isn’t the case?
Just to clarify this, I am not even sure Icet even knew considering our interaction
Or like they knew but didn’t actually register it but I can’t go about it here
Leafia there’s 2 things which have happened on different days.
1 - The virgin failed to proc
2 - The undertaker got a wrong result
At least one of these has to be due to poison.
You’re literally ignoring your results for… little to no reason.
Plus, I’m not even sure Litten knew who the real UT was by N2.
Litten knew because of Icet leaking it.
We are missing a drunk if you think I posioned the virgin and neither the virgin or investigator is drunk
I did not actually, which led to a funny interaction when I learned who it was because I thought may was spy who knew
Why are we missing anything?
We might not have a baron, we could just have an outsider that’s lying.
Our only evidence of a baron is me
It’s base one right?
Kiiruma, that can be explained through other ways too.
- I could be the drunk. This can be possible regardless of whether or not Neblig was poisoned and I’m socially reading Litten as good right now.
We have evidence of a Baron
How many outsider claims do we have Litten?
2
It can be explained by other ways but the fact that the Virgin (Who Litten neighbours) didn’t proc and the Undertaker (Who Litten knows of) got wrong infromation does lead credence to Litten just being a poisoner.
1 Like