elaborate bc i don’t get it
honestly it feels like a shitty romance novel from 50 years later
kinda
which honestly im all for but
this is true but it was also published in like
1950
so
naturally everyone denies it
i do have a source that says its gay tho one sec
if you don’t get it already it’ll take a while for me to explain why it’s the case
the short of it is that those characters absorb so much attention from female fandom it’s absurd
2 Likes
this thing
Subsequent to his book’s success, John Knowles came out as gay and stated that his
characters, Finny and Gene, are indeed in love. This, however, is not explicit in the
novel. Rather the story focuses on deep friendship, on not necessarily knowing oneself,
and on the struggle that is self-discovery.
1 Like
and you’ll see that series without these characters have vastly different dynamics than those with
1 Like
this source unfortunently has no source but
hmmyes
oh ok yeah
the problem is specifically with mlm-centric media. because the focus will always be on the mlm couple
1 Like
…I cannot add onto this conversation…I think. Even though Min has strong feelings about this topic.
Ping me if you need assistance.
1 Like
Brokeback Mountain WATCHERS when the actor for one of the two leads says that he didn’t think his character was gay
1 Like
this is real
1 Like
whats brokeback mountain
gay cowboy sex movie
nice