rimworld is a really fun management game that at every turn goes out of its’ way to make the most baffling ludonarrative decision imaginable
slavery, cannibalism, turning humans into chairs, murder, looting, kidnapping, human trafficking, organ trafficking, unethical genetic experiments, cults, sometimes poaching and i think they added weaponized pollution
my impression of rimworld is its like dwarf fortress except instead of dwarfs its just guys and instead of fortresses its
uhhh
worlds
yeah
you forgot “WHY IS THERE NO TABLE IM GONNA THROW A MURDEROUS FIT”
that is a bar you are setting though, and failure to meet it does not make something objectively “not good”
ive never seen a game come with this many arguments about it i do gotta say its p interesting
sorry i forgot about it because i downloaded the mod where eating without a table instantly kills you
honestly this is a surprisingly cogent description, I think I get it
i know you’re joking but i hate this argument so much because people who make it are literally actively choosing to disregard the actual text of the games to support their arguments
subjectivity is implied. i do not feel i have to state “In my opinion,” at the start of every sentence like I’m ChatGPT and I have to constantly remind you of something
hardcore players play with this mod
i don’t think pokemon scarlet and violet have ever been mentioned without causing some sort of argument
is that gen V i know nothing about pokemon
rimworld is a fun video game that really really wants you to know how much it hates indigenous people
like that’s the overwhelming fact about it. it does this so fucking often it’s insane
nah gen 5 is black and white
granted… both gen 5 and gen 9 start arguments, just for entirely different reasons
okay except you’re trying to prove that I’m wrong for thinking palworld is a “good game” because of X Y Z reasons
like im just out here talkin about this thing I like and you started this whole argument about how that makes me a bad judge of things because it’s bad
if that isn’t treating it as objective idk what is lel
if my language has come off like that, i sincerely apologise. now if you’ll excuse me i’m going to have a panic attack over this
if you use lel in an argument it automatically invalidates your entire point sorry