Willow, your opening stance on Wortox is inconsistent. Could you explain your thought process behind writing the second relevant paragraph when your final conclusion leaned towards the first statement?
I mistook the second post of Wortox’s for one of Wilson’s, since it referenced the same joke. I am having some trouble with all the new faces. With this new context, I wolfread both a little less, as it doesn’t appear that Wilson was as strongly clinging to the same opening joke.
If you would actually like to move the game forward, as you claim, you would know that we must endure some useless questioning to do so. At least this generates legible interaction.